RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Voices from our pro-equality future (present?) » Anti-gay orgs continue to offend children of single parents, gay parents, more » Apple CEO gives 'substantial' sum to HRC's southern state project; may or may not have used ApplePay » Conservative proposes new way for vendors to tell gay customers they don't care for them » NOM versus David Koch » Anti-equality baseball player calls reporter 'a prick' for asking about his anti-equality advocacy » Audio: Josh Duggar defends discrimination, invalidates own point » Audio: AFA's Fischer names 'homosexual agenda' as 'greatest threat to liberty' in American history » Audio: AFA Radio caller calls for executing gays; FRC-employed host doesn't even challenge him, much less condemn » NOM president's other organization is 'in trouble' (his words) too  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/04/2010

Because even dead honorees become hyper-partisan debates

by Jeremy Hooper

Reagan-MettlerAn official in Bakersfield, California's Kern High School District, who also happens to be running for state assembly as a conservative, is pushing a ridiculous new end-run around the honoring of Harvey Milk's legacy:

Trustee Ken Mettler, who is also running in the 32nd Assembly District Republican primary, will ask his board colleagues at a Monday meeting to adopt a policy discouraging schools from celebrating Harvey Milk Day May 22, which honors one of the first openly gay men elected to public office in California.

He will also ask trustees to support a state Senate bill establishing Ronald Reagan Day, which would fall on Feb. 6.

Ken Mettler proposes anti-Milk, pro-Reagan school policies [Californian]

Because it has to be a tradeoff: Either recognize one prominent public figure or honor another, more conservative person (who joined Harvey in opposition to the anti-gay Briggs Initiative, btw)? What kind of logic is that? What possible reason, other than far-right politicking, does Mr. Mettler have to issue his own proclamation against legislation that encourages (but does not require) recognition of Milk?

Look, we fully support the right to push for a day honoring the Gipper. But suggesting that this honor must also water down Milk? Well that's a bad idea for both glasses and classes.

***

*Lest there be any confusion about where Mr. Mettler stands:

Screen Shot 2010-05-04 At 11.36.40 Am-2
Ken Mettler's Facebook

**ALSO: Andy Towle reminds us of something from Mettler's "Yes on 8" past: BAKERSFIELD SCHOOL TRUSTEE WHO THREW PUNCH AT 'NO ON 8' SUPPORTER NOW WANTS 'HARVEY MILK DAY' BANNED [TR]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails