RECENT  POSTS:  » Riiiiiiight, FRC. And 'Desperate Housewives' is still TV's hot new show, too » After death do us part: Indignity of Idaho's marriage ban threatens lesbian veteran's final wishes » NOM's Chair to Oregon: We have a right to tell courts our personal, conservative Catholic opinions! » Nice try, anti-equality movement, but the lesbian 'throuple' story makes our argument, not yours » Jonah Goldberg can't see the hornets' nest for its hornets » Video: Male on mail » Jodie Foster in 2013: 'I am'; Jodie Foster in 2014: 'I do' » AFA promotes its new app in only way it knows how » Robert Oscar Lopez says I perform 'psychological operations routine' on him when I quote his own words from his own web site » Matt Barber's ever-classy site suggests gay people are literally crushing fellow humans  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/13/2010

Flashback Thursday: 'Protect marriage' finds its fallacious, offensive legs

by Jeremy Hooper

2/10/1996: Alanis is all over the airwaves singing about rain on wedding days. Meanwhile, self-appointed moral authoritarians begin taking to those same airwaves to reign over our own:

Fourteen years later, we supporters of basic civil equality are still waiting to take this tyrannically-mandated pause buttons that has been pressed upon our socially conscious lives so that we can move on to dedicate our full capacities to TRUE problems and TRUE "protections." Just the opportunity cost alone should make you angry.

Isn't it ironic? No. It's f***ing enraging.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails