RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/26/2010

FRC's senior fellow called for gays' exportation/criminalization. Yet *we're* the "radical' ones!?!

by Jeremy Hooper

The Family Research Council -- a group whose leaders are on record calling for gay exportation, backing gay criminalization, and referring to gays as "being held captive by the enemy" -- is continuing the unprincipled fight to keep gays held captive by the military closet. And in a truly disingenuous turn, Tony Perkins and Co. are now cherry-picking certain testimonies to make them sound like they're the prevailing opinions on DADT repeal, a subject that holds large public support:

No no, military commanders aren't on board. Except for, oh, you know: The nation’s top two defense officials, Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen and Defense Secretary Robert Gates! Plus there's former Joint Chiefs Chairs Colin Powell and General John Shalikashvili, Iraq war vet Patrick Murphy (D-PA), or former Defense Secretary Dick Cheney. Not to mention the Commander in Chief. And even the folks that FRC uses as examples actually do support the Pentagon's implementation review, even if they are reluctant to come out for repeal/immediate moratorium.

Oh, and as for James Conway, the one whose quote FRC most highlights? Well, his personal views are so stalled on the issue of open service that he actually went on record to say that gays should have separate barracks:


Conway Concerned With Gays in Barracks [Military.com]

But then again, this is FRC, a conservative organization whose senior policy fellow backs our exportation/criminalization (a point we cannot make enough times). Perhaps we should just be glad that it's only barracks that they're pushing Baracks to leave biased (for now).

201005260941-1

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails