RECENT  POSTS:  » 2006: When Clinton vocally supported her state moving forward w/ marriage equality but Sanders did not » Where art thou, Jeremy? » Video: Ad for blemish remover/ tourist spot for our new, bettered America » Whether justified or Kim Davis-ed, individualistic rage rarely outplays broader truths » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/26/2010

FRC's senior fellow called for gays' exportation/criminalization. Yet *we're* the "radical' ones!?!

by Jeremy Hooper

The Family Research Council -- a group whose leaders are on record calling for gay exportation, backing gay criminalization, and referring to gays as "being held captive by the enemy" -- is continuing the unprincipled fight to keep gays held captive by the military closet. And in a truly disingenuous turn, Tony Perkins and Co. are now cherry-picking certain testimonies to make them sound like they're the prevailing opinions on DADT repeal, a subject that holds large public support:

No no, military commanders aren't on board. Except for, oh, you know: The nation’s top two defense officials, Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen and Defense Secretary Robert Gates! Plus there's former Joint Chiefs Chairs Colin Powell and General John Shalikashvili, Iraq war vet Patrick Murphy (D-PA), or former Defense Secretary Dick Cheney. Not to mention the Commander in Chief. And even the folks that FRC uses as examples actually do support the Pentagon's implementation review, even if they are reluctant to come out for repeal/immediate moratorium.

Oh, and as for James Conway, the one whose quote FRC most highlights? Well, his personal views are so stalled on the issue of open service that he actually went on record to say that gays should have separate barracks:


Conway Concerned With Gays in Barracks [Military.com]

But then again, this is FRC, a conservative organization whose senior policy fellow backs our exportation/criminalization (a point we cannot make enough times). Perhaps we should just be glad that it's only barracks that they're pushing Baracks to leave biased (for now).

201005260941-1

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails