RECENT  POSTS:  » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama » In 2008, the AFA was the same on LGBT rights as President Obama; and I was a flying unicorn » The Hitching Post plot thickens in a truly remarkable way » On Rivka, Robert and their dirty, self-victimizing, anti-intellectual blame game » POTUS believes in fifty-state equality, happy with way it's playing out  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/14/2010

Video: Bush fans fair-weather, except when it came to rain on gay wedding days

by Jeremy Hooper

It doesn't surprise us that conservatives are annoyed with Laura Bush for coming out in favor of marriage equality. But it does annoy us when they couple their annoyance with certifiably alse logic. And when they say things like what CWA's Wendy Wright says in the following clip, it should annoy those modern Americans who aren't even personal involved in the marriage conversation:

So why are Wendy's comments particularly offensive and overreaching? Well, because she is essentially saying that if Laura Bush would have come out in favor of marriage equality back in say '04, it would have derailed her husband's presidency. So basically she's saying that support for that president from people like Wendy and groups like CWA hinged so much on whether or not the man would stop gay citizens from having equal protection under the law, that the entire future of the nation would have been changed by Laura Bush's simple stand for basic civil fairness. Not her stance on the wars. Not the economy. Not any of the other issues that came up during the Bush years. It was the gays who had to be dutifully kept in line by both husband and wife, lest those who prioritized things like finding justifications for wars, preserving diplomacy worldwide, and staving off deficits bring in some kind of "radicalism." Lest the historic game of anti-gay scapegoating conducted at the most bullying of pulpits not find its way in the legacy.

But the worst part about it? Wendy's probably not wrong in her assessment. Just her soul-numbing concerns.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails