RECENT  POSTS:  » GLAAD: Q&A with former 'ex-gay' activist Yvette Schneider: 'I’ve never met an 'ex-gay' man I thought was not still attracted to men' » Head of Virginia's anti-equality org: 'open season to discriminate against anyone who believes that children deserve a mom and a dad' » Force behind Virginia's marriage ban ably demonstrates animus behind it » NOM to show rest of world its impressive ability to exacerbate loss » Bryan Fischer: Marriage equality supporters are like baseball's legendarily winning team » On NC's Attorney General and the bipartisan hunt for a 'culture war' off ramp » Read: 4th Circuit strikes down Virginia marriage ban » GLAAD: Change is possible: Former 'ex-gay' activist Yvette Schneider 'celebrates the worthiness and equality of all people' » Man who stands in way of Texas equality works to stunt economic windfall as well » Miami-Dade Circuit judge rules state marriage ban unconstitutional; stays ruling  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/14/2010

Video: Bush fans fair-weather, except when it came to rain on gay wedding days

by Jeremy Hooper

It doesn't surprise us that conservatives are annoyed with Laura Bush for coming out in favor of marriage equality. But it does annoy us when they couple their annoyance with certifiably alse logic. And when they say things like what CWA's Wendy Wright says in the following clip, it should annoy those modern Americans who aren't even personal involved in the marriage conversation:

So why are Wendy's comments particularly offensive and overreaching? Well, because she is essentially saying that if Laura Bush would have come out in favor of marriage equality back in say '04, it would have derailed her husband's presidency. So basically she's saying that support for that president from people like Wendy and groups like CWA hinged so much on whether or not the man would stop gay citizens from having equal protection under the law, that the entire future of the nation would have been changed by Laura Bush's simple stand for basic civil fairness. Not her stance on the wars. Not the economy. Not any of the other issues that came up during the Bush years. It was the gays who had to be dutifully kept in line by both husband and wife, lest those who prioritized things like finding justifications for wars, preserving diplomacy worldwide, and staving off deficits bring in some kind of "radicalism." Lest the historic game of anti-gay scapegoating conducted at the most bullying of pulpits not find its way in the legacy.

But the worst part about it? Wendy's probably not wrong in her assessment. Just her soul-numbing concerns.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails