RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Man who's called for exporting gays goes on CNN to defend Indiana law, earns deserved result » Man who insinuated it's better to be thrown into sea than support homosexuality attended #SB101 signing ceremony » Considering vast (and frankly odd) amount of time he spends talking about us, no wonder Tony Perkins thinks we're 'special' » FRC keeps lying about where majority of Americans stand on marriage equality » Audio: Indiana restaurant owner openly discriminates against gays, glad to have added protection to do so » Indiana legislature, Gov. Pence awaken a fierce, powerful, anti-discrimination giant » Eleven Republican US Sens. give anti-gay conservatives a taste of a near and less divisive future » NOM proudly touts #March4Marriage backers who believe homosexuality 'should be treated by society as immoral, dangerous perversion' » Video: Gee, with compelling videos like this one, I just can't imagine why the anti-gay right is losing in court » #TBT: Even after legal equality, Americans—and particularly religious Americans—struggle to accept certain marriages  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/17/2010

If Prop 8's overturned, elections will be replaced with pissing matches. Or something.

by Jeremy Hooper

And now yet another social conservative will take the federal Prop 8 trial and disingenuously act as if it's the right to vote itself that's on trial. Hit it, Alliance Defense Fund attorney Austin Nimocks:

"[The Prop 8 trial] is a question over whether our most basic and important fundamental right -- the right to vote -- is going to be trumped by the courts" ..."No right is more important in this country than the right of a free society to express their will at the ballot box."
...
"Right now, the plaintiffs are continuing to ask a single judge to trump the voices of seven-million Americans," ... "It's the most basic, fundamental, constitutional question we have in this country -- and the will of the people should prevail."
Final Prop. 8 arguments heard [ONN]

Right. Because that's what we gays are challenging: The nature of referendum itself. Not the constitutional implications of said referendum. Not the ability of majority tyranny to overturn a civil rights ruling. Not the religious freedom vs. equal protection questions. No, no -- it's that we hate the plebiscite, not the prejudicial plays.

Uh huh, Austin. And the Scopes trial was all about the right to buy, sell, and consume bananas while still feeling comfortably human, not an acceptance of our known world's factuality.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails