RECENT  POSTS:  » #RFRA and a movement that shirks responsibility (almost) as much as it shirks equality » Audio: Limbaugh admits #RFRA fight is about same-sex marriage; links homosexuality to bestiality » Sen Schumer, federal #RFRA coauthor, knocks down lie that Indiana's version is the same » Video: I can't fathom invoking concentration camps in my political discourse. But Glenn Beck on the other hand... » Get a load of this double-talk from the Family Research Council #RFRA #Indiana » NOM admits 'religious freedom' bills are about discriminating against same-sex couples; thanks, NOM » 'Indianapolis Star' to Governor Pence: FIX THIS NOW » Bill Maher's monologue on dialogue he'd prefer remain a monologue » Video: Even Michael Steele thinks Indiana law is too broad; Ryan T. Anderson constantly interrupts, still loses » Watch Gov. Pence heap praise on lobbying group that admitted #SB101 was all about same-sex marriage  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/30/2010

The 'how' approved in WI; the 'what' will inevitably fail everywhere

by Jeremy Hooper

Wisconsin court, 7-0:

The court rejected a lawsuit that claimed the amendment violated a rule that limits referendum questions to a single subject. The lawsuit, filed by a voter opposed to the amendment, argued that gay marriage and civil unions were two different subjects.
Wisconsin Supreme Court upholds gay marriage ban [AP via WaPo]

Not surprising, really. This "single subject" question is basically the same grounds on which the CA Supreme court upheld Prop 8. It's not the more fundamental question: Whether or not this and EVERY state constitutional amendment is legally kosher under the law. That's where we will (and should) win.

So don't let Maggie Gallagher's inevitable celebrations deter you, kiddies. The technical question of whether or not a certain referendum was carried out in the right way is important to the process and certainly worthy of discussion. But a "yes!" nod should actually light a fire under our side's more powerful and prevailing case, not the "NO!" side's intrinsically flawed effort.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails