RECENT  POSTS:  » Your daily 'Gay Gestapo' moment with the American Family Association's senior analyst » Scott Lively equates accurately noting his public record with inciting murder » Audio: Mark Regnerus doesn't think marriage equality has 'a lot of gas left' » Friday: NOM president shares the bill with 'ex-gay' activists » Today in 'um, yeah, obviously': Stunt marriages not confined to opposite-sex partnerships » Video: Brian Brown's fellow panelist gives insight into Moscow panel's extreme views on homosexuality, marriage » Video: TN man condemns gays with Leviticus billboards; oddly allows local Red Lobsters to remain open » Video: 'Ex-gay' speaker at upcoming ERLC summit equates talking to gay people with talking to cancer patients » GLAAD: Mainstream media is catching on to NOM's broader agenda » FRC's Values Voter Summit puts anti-gay bakers on a marriage panel; so we won, basically  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/12/2010

For better for worse, for richer for poorer, for principled for discriminatory

by Jeremy Hooper

create avatarIt's such a balance here in New York. We locals are thrilled that our state recognizes same-sex unions, even while we remain dumbfounded about how and why we serve as a western wall between the rest of America and four full-fledged marriage equality states (and one, Maine, that had marriage before seeing it tyrannically rolled back).

To make do (or "I do," as it were), many of us nups-craving gays have been crossing the border into a place like CT so that we can have a semi-close-to-home wedding, before returning back to the Empire State to see those marriages fully recognized. But fortunately, it's not just gay folk. Some of our elected allies are also seeing the reasons for doing so:

One city official is making a statement on gay marriage by refusing to get married in his home state.

Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer says he and fiancee Elyse Buxbaum have decided to get married in Connecticut, rather than New York, because Connecticut allows same-sex unions and New York does not.

Stringer tells The New York Times the couple made the decision out of solidarity with gay friends who can't get married in their home state either.

If Gays Can't Marry in NY, Scott Stringer Won't Either [NBC New York]

So basically, in marriage lingo: Connecticut is becoming the fun cake, food, and open bar that makes wedding attendance so worthwhile; New York is becoming the super boring set of 1500 photos that your friends force you feign interest towards. The former, with all the commerce, the love, and the joy, is the tastefully decorated reception hall, while the latter is the stale office building with buzzing fluorescent light. Peaceful celebration vs. "Just tell me what I need to do to protect my family, I'm in a friggin' hurry. Oh, and do you validate parking?"

Don't get this writer wrong: I am personally and professionally thrilled about what my state does offer -- as a husband, citizen, activist, and principled human being. But come on, NY! National history is watching and mocking, local economists are counting and weeping, and the LGB population is wondering if maybe Hartford might be the new Chelsea!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails