RECENT  POSTS:  » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs » The religious anti-gay crowd: They never understood the marriage fight; now they don't understand their loss  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/30/2010

One man (who celebrates Christmas), one woman (who observes Easter)

by Jeremy Hooper

Lest you think the Concerned Women For America are only interested in controlling our same-sex unions, let us now look at the latest Janice-Shaw-Crousefrom CWA's Janice Crouse. Because as you will see, she's not too keen on Christians in interfaith marriages either:

Religion that is not practiced is little more than a set of myths and of no more significance than the fairy tales told to toddlers at bedtime. Faith that does not make demands on behavior is not faith at all. Inevitably, a lack of unity in faith entails multiple problems on both the little and the large issues that couples continuously encounter as they face the task of building a strong, meaningful, harmonious marriage. How could it possibly be otherwise?
Clinton Wedding Raises Questions of Interfaith Marriage [CWA]

It's an important point to recognize. Because even though gay marriages are clearly of much greater "concern" to them, it's clear that many of members of our organized opposition are truly seeking a world where "traditional marriage" is far more limited than they'd ever publicly admit. A world where they see within themselves a right to "raise questions" about everyone else's partnership and the civil recognition thereof. It's a push that should not only concern LGBT people and their allies, but rather anyone who knows that hearts function best when their barbed wire is removed!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails