RECENT  POSTS:  » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/27/2010

Video: Involvement = yes. Theocracy = no.

by Jeremy Hooper

The Focus on the Family boys focus on Christians in politics, yet they ask the wrong fundamental question:


[SOURCE]

Their question: "Should Christians be involved in politics?" And of course the obvious answer to that is yes. All Americans should be involved in the process in some way. At the very least informed about what's going on.

But the major oversight -- the one that has divided American politics for the past several decades -- lies in framing of this question itself. Because for their purposes, what Stuart and Tom should instead be asking is: "Should Christians get a church-state-mixing pass that no other religious or civil group is given, one that allows them to legislate their version of morality and discriminate in the civil sector?" And the (should-be) obvious answer to that is a big, fat, resounding NO! Nobody should be overreaching on the basis of their personally-held faith views in a way that turns basic, constitutional fairness and equality into an undeserved debate. So in short: No group should be doing exactly what Focus on the Family has been doing for over three decades.

Groups like FoTF have created a world where "Christian" means only one socially conservative thing, where "politics" is a game that must always come with contrived "culture war" asides, and where "involved" means shaping the world so that it bends decidedly towards evangelical favoritism. Their fight is one that seeks to have many groups, chief among them LGBT people, subjugated by the "values" that the religious right has decided to focus on at this particular time in history. With an answer like that, you'll have to forgive us if we see ourselves as the ones who deserve to ask the questions.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails