RECENT  POSTS:  » Openly anti-gay Chief Justice of AL Supreme Court vows to openly defy marriage equality » AFA's Director of Issues Analysis: LGBT activists possess 'unvarnished energy of Satan himself » Wait, FRC has been able to 'uphold natural marriage'? That's news to all non–cave dwellers! » Because when am I not calling up Fox News personalities to do my bidding? » Anti-equality conservative admits GLAAD CAP is 'smart' and 'effective' » You know what's not presidential? Like at all? » Inevitable justice temporarily delayed in Alabama » Read: Fed. judge strikes Alabama marriage ban; no stay on ruling » Derisively remembering when full equality was in 'Jeopardy!' » When all else fails, demand your letters are capitalized  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/27/2010

Video: Involvement = yes. Theocracy = no.

by Jeremy Hooper

The Focus on the Family boys focus on Christians in politics, yet they ask the wrong fundamental question:


[SOURCE]

Their question: "Should Christians be involved in politics?" And of course the obvious answer to that is yes. All Americans should be involved in the process in some way. At the very least informed about what's going on.

But the major oversight -- the one that has divided American politics for the past several decades -- lies in framing of this question itself. Because for their purposes, what Stuart and Tom should instead be asking is: "Should Christians get a church-state-mixing pass that no other religious or civil group is given, one that allows them to legislate their version of morality and discriminate in the civil sector?" And the (should-be) obvious answer to that is a big, fat, resounding NO! Nobody should be overreaching on the basis of their personally-held faith views in a way that turns basic, constitutional fairness and equality into an undeserved debate. So in short: No group should be doing exactly what Focus on the Family has been doing for over three decades.

Groups like FoTF have created a world where "Christian" means only one socially conservative thing, where "politics" is a game that must always come with contrived "culture war" asides, and where "involved" means shaping the world so that it bends decidedly towards evangelical favoritism. Their fight is one that seeks to have many groups, chief among them LGBT people, subjugated by the "values" that the religious right has decided to focus on at this particular time in history. With an answer like that, you'll have to forgive us if we see ourselves as the ones who deserve to ask the questions.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails