RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/02/2010

Just say NO(m)!

by Jeremy Hooper

Nancy-ReaganWhen former FLOTUS Nancy Reagan went about her '80s era "Just say No!" campaign, the focus was on drugs in the light of that decade's growing crack epidemic. But when modern conservatives use the term? Well, it's equality-supporting Supreme Court justices who are likened to heroin needles:

“We are in a battle for your future as Americans, as a society. . . . We have an obligation as Christians and Americans to speak out for truth. This is not a partisan issue it is a principles issue.”

“Join me and remember in November. . . . With the vote for the Supreme Court this fall, take your advice from Nancy Reagan: “Just say no!”

-Tamara Scott, Director of the Iowa Chapter of Concerned Women for America,
as quoted by the National Organization for Marriage

Scott's reference, made at yesterday's NOM tour stop in Des Moines, refers to the three Iowa state Supreme Court justices -- Chief Justice Marsha Ternus and Associate Justices Michael Streit and David Baker -- who are up for retention votes this November. And of course their major "crime" is that they put a crack pipe in local youths' hands, sparked it up, and threw an entire generation of Iowa's teens onto a nonstop roller coaster filled with pushers and pimps and sullen Coltrane tunes defended constitutional fairness for same-sex couples.

But don't you dare think Scott's historically ridiculous comparison is offensive to either Nan Regan's work, the nature of a fair-minded independent judiciary, or to the loving gay couples who are being shunned. Because it's all three -- the comparison is deeply offensive to all three.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails