RECENT  POSTS:  » Read: NOM's guide to pressuring lawmakers to ban marriages (while pretending you're doing something good and positive instead) » Full trailer: 'The Normal Heart' » Vintage Clinton era oppo memo perhaps even more relevant today » Concerned Women For America advises churches to lockdown exclusionary marriage views » Video: What does conservative columnist Cal Thomas see as America's biggest threat? Take a guess. » Correcting NOM's fallacious fear graphic » Gee, Bryan, can't understand why federal courts are rejecting you gay = incest view » Former NOM sr. associate admits shift: Moving away from intellectual arguments, focusing on spiritual » Prop 8 defense attorney now planning lesbian daughter's wedding » If you can't afford your event, NOM, perhaps you should just cancel  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/13/2010

No, no, FRC doesn't do the whole people/animals thing. Ya know, except on the first page of one of their anti-gay brochures, complete with a graphic of a horse

by Jeremy Hooper

Earlier today, we showed you some video wherein the Family Research Council's Tom McCluskey responded to radio host David Pakman's mention of the way social conservatives sometimes liken same-sex unions to bestiality by saying, "you're not gonna hear the people and animals argument from [FRC]." So that being the case, we here at G-A-Y now feel compelled to remind Mr. McClusky that a horse is, in fact, part of the animal kingdom. An animal upon which FRC has quite gladly relied in the past:

The Family Research Council's "Slippery Slope To Same-Sex Marriage" document, page 1:
Screen Shot 2010-08-13 At 2.06.20 Pm
[SOURCE]
(H/t to G-A-Y commenter Christopher)

Though knowing FRC's duplicity, they'd probably say that we still didn't hear the people/animals claims -- we just read them.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails