RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Man misapplies personal trauma to sexual orientation science » WND's editor fundamentally misunderstands nondiscrimination law (part 3 of 3) » Video: Why is this shockingly anti-gay (among other things) speech happening in a Connecticut public school? » Fined NY event space to host same-sex wedding receptions (*but no ceremonies for anyone) » Another day, another far-right pastor pushing Christians to civil war » Joseph Farah still clueless about nondiscrimination law » Hobby Lobby president to join extremely anti-gay activists at 'Star Spangled' event » FRC's Sprigg admits his side put up 'weak defense' in 7th Circuit » Photo: The latest totally convincing, in no way silly attempt at a meme from anti-gay Ruth Institute » AFA's Fischer: Time for Christians to 'get up in somebody's grill' like Jesus would  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/20/2010

FRC's #DADT webcast: Someone please get these six men some toy soldiers or something

by Jeremy Hooper

Some thoughts:

-Someone needs to give these folks some new talking points. If they're going to keep giving verbose speeches to essentially say, "I'm just not comfortable with gay people," they can at least mix it up a bit. "Slippery slope"? Gays "choosing" their "conduct"? The idea that only anti-gay Christians have "religious freedom" in this nation? Etc., etc. It's all so tired!

-Someone needs to tell Tony Perkins that he wasn't disinvited form Andrews Air Force base because of his faith: He was disinvited because of the comments he made just moments after the State of the Union speech, when he wrote that this nation's Commander in Chief is "willing to jeopardize our nation’s security to advance the agenda of the radical homosexual lobby." For many within the military culture, comments like these go well beyond normal politicking and partisanship -- they are unfair assessments of the one person who outranks all other military officers. And since nobody is constitutionally owed a speaking engagement, that same military culture has every right to disinvite a speaker who has, on his own volition, put forth such a disrespectful judgment of the Commander in Chief's own judgment call.

-Someone needs to tell Harry Jackson that press conferences are not call-and-response revivals. We know the participant most likely agrees with what's being said, or he or she probably wouldn't be standing up there. So there's no need to give vocal affirmation and/or applause every five seconds.


Oh whatever, just go watch (as much as you can stand):


***

**EARLIER: FRC's press release making an unnecessary issue out of race: Today at 2PM: FRC to explain why past military bias was bad, current is somehow good [G-A-Y]

***

**UPDATE: And now for people who actually know what they're talking about: Gay Service Members Discuss ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ [NY Times]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails