RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Voices from our pro-equality future (present?) » Anti-gay orgs continue to offend children of single parents, gay parents, more » Apple CEO gives 'substantial' sum to HRC's southern state project; may or may not have used ApplePay » Conservative proposes new way for vendors to tell gay customers they don't care for them » NOM versus David Koch » Anti-equality baseball player calls reporter 'a prick' for asking about his anti-equality advocacy » Audio: Josh Duggar defends discrimination, invalidates own point » Audio: AFA's Fischer names 'homosexual agenda' as 'greatest threat to liberty' in American history » Audio: AFA Radio caller calls for executing gays; FRC-employed host doesn't even challenge him, much less condemn » NOM president's other organization is 'in trouble' (his words) too  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/13/2010

Iowa For Freedom: Liars.

by Jeremy Hooper

Remember when we showed you the outrageous way that the so-called "Iowa For Mob Rule" "Iowa For Freedom" group is flipping the script on Sandra Day O'Connor's opposition to their efforts so that it seems like the retired Supreme Court justice is instead supporting their cause? Yea, well -- the organizational deception just got a gagillion times worse!

First, look at this. This is how IowaPolitics.com reports some recent comments that O'Connor made it Des Moines:

“We have to address the pressures that are being applied to that one safe place, the courtroom,” O’Connor said. “We have to have a place where judges are not subject to outright retaliation for their judicial decisions. That’s the concept. Sure they can be ousted and that’s part of the system, but what the framers of our federal constitution tried to do was establish a system of judicial selection where the judges would not be subject to retaliation by the other branches for their judicial actions.”
O'Connor touts Iowa's merit system of selecting judges [IowaPolitics.com]

We can all agree that she expressed total opposition to the attempt to politically retaliate against the justices who voted for marriage equality, yes? Okay, right -- so now check out the following pic. This is a graphic that Iowa For Freedom is running on their campaign site:

Sandrablog2
LIE: Sandra Day O’Conner (sic) on Removing Activist Judges [Iowa For Freedom]

Yup, your eyes are still working: These supposed "freedom-lovers" completely truncated O'Connor's comment, even cutting off the one quoted line in mid sentence without using ellipses to indicate an incomplete thought. Basically they have taken someone who's entire effort in Iowa has been to enlighten the public about the role of the fair and independent judiciary, and are instead using her to further muddy the waters of this conversation! It's truly offensive, both to our republic and our collective intellect. Especially to Iowans' brains and, well -- freedom.

And why does it matter on an empirical level? Well, here check this out: These are the two comments that follow the above blog posting:

Screen Shot 2010-09-13 At 9.46.41 Am

And that's exactly what Iowa For Freedom and its leader, Bob Vander Plaats, wants to happens. This anti-LGBT crew wants their supporters to be deliberately deceived, because they know that blinders are the only way that their ugly double-dealing will remain imperceptible.

***

**UPDATE: Go ahead and leave a comment. As of now, mine is unapproved:

Screen Shot 2010-09-13 At 9.56.14 Am

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails