RECENT  POSTS:  » Read: NOM's guide to pressuring lawmakers to ban marriages (while pretending you're doing something good and positive instead) » Full trailer: 'The Normal Heart' » Vintage Clinton era oppo memo perhaps even more relevant today » Concerned Women For America advises churches to lockdown exclusionary marriage views » Video: What does conservative columnist Cal Thomas see as America's biggest threat? Take a guess. » Correcting NOM's fallacious fear graphic » Gee, Bryan, can't understand why federal courts are rejecting you gay = incest view » Former NOM sr. associate admits shift: Moving away from intellectual arguments, focusing on spiritual » Prop 8 defense attorney now planning lesbian daughter's wedding » If you can't afford your event, NOM, perhaps you should just cancel  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/01/2010

We the People of the FRC, in order to form a more perfect fundraising pitch...

by Jeremy Hooper

200809120939-1-1-1The Family Research Council is directly relating their upcoming Values Voters Summit to the signing of the U.S. Constitution:

On September 17, 1787, the U.S. Constitution was signed by 37 brave men who saw the United States not as it currently was, but what it could be. They understood something that many today, two hundred and twenty three years later, still understand, that the historical document's first three words, "We The People," are there to affirm that the government of the United States exists to serve its citizens not the other way around. Celebrating the Constitution is an underlying theme at this year's Values Voters Summit (VVS), September 17-19, including a panel discussion sponsored by our partners at the Heritage Foundation and on Saturday a live reading of the U.S. Constitution at 5 p.m [SOURCE]

Wait a minute -- "saw the United States not as it currently was, but what it could be"? Aren't these the same "values voters" who are constantly telling us that we do not have a right to same-sex marriage because it was not expressly included in the constitution's text and because the founding fathers could never have imagined it? What, is discomfort around gay people the one thing these "37 brave men" got right?!

Well call us historical blasphemers if you must, but somehow we think more than a few of the constitution's crafters, if dropped into 2010 America, would most likely be concerned about the way certain groups are constantly using "the people" as a phrase of division, turning the constitution itself into a political weapon against certain kinds of citizens, and hijacking words like "family" and "research" while rejecting credible forms of both.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails