RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/25/2010

Dancing with ourselves: NOM's Ruth Institute compares gay unions to self-love

by Jeremy Hooper

Over at the Ruth Institute (an official National Organization For Marriage affiliate), site blogger "Ari" has posed the following question:

You know what makes about as much sense as same sex “marriage”? [Ruth blog]

And the answer Ari pairs with the question comes in the form of this article:

Chen Wei-yih has posed for a set of photos in a flowing white dress, enlisted a wedding planner and rented a banquet hall for a marriage celebration with 30 friends.

But there is no groom. Chen will marry herself.

Uninspired by the men she's met but facing social pressure to get married, the 30-year-old Taipei office worker will hold the reception next month in honor of just one person.

Bride-to-be set to say 'I do' — to herself [Reuters via MSNBC]

Yes, that's right: The Ruth Institute is now comparing equal marriage rights for same-sex couples to an absurd kicker story about a bride holding a non-binding ceremony with herself. because that's exactly how these "pro-family" folks tend to view us: As oddities. As stories fit for the "news of the weird" section. As anomalies. As people whose wedding photos deserve to be slurred with "perversion" labels. As citizens whose civil marriage rights are as binding as weddings between me & I.

Bullies don't always age out of the system.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails