RECENT  POSTS:  » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win.  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/04/2010

Iowans against the independent judiciary: 'We The People Will Provide Moral Authority'

by Jeremy Hooper


One version of "moral authority" vs. one unanimous court decision steeped in constitutional authority.

One flawed description of America's co-equal branches of government vs. one concrete actuality regarding the same.

One crew who's bastardizing the term "freedom" vs. One Iowa.

One group of self-appointed moral authoritarians vs. one vulnerable population sect.

One vote that could send a chill down the spine of fairness-loving Americans vs. one opportunity to stand up and stop the tyranny.

"Won nothing tangible at all!" vs. one opportunity to protect those who delivered the gay community a long overdue win.

***

*SEE ALSO: Our complete Iowa For Freedom Archive

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails