RECENT  POSTS:  » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/27/2010

Nature vs. nurture vs. state issue

by Jeremy Hooper

Tea Party candidate for U.S. Senate Joe Miller (R, Alaska) was a star of his Salina Central High School quiz team:

Salina Journal, 2/20/84
Screen Shot 2010-10-27 At 10.07.40 Am

So one would think Joe would know that if a man answers "it's a states issue" to the question of whether or not he thinks homosexuality is a choice, that answer is much more likely to be met with a negative buzzer than an affirmative bell ring. But in an interview with modern-day quiz team moderator Rachel Maddow, Joe seems to have forgotten his training:

Oh Joe. You'll vote for an FMA because both votes and biological realities should be decided by the state? Huh?!

::sigh:: Ginny McGaughy, what did you whisper to him 26 years ago?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails