RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/12/2010

The only thing Dov Hikind's Westboro aggression does for LGBT rights: It temporarily stops him from comparing gays to incest

by Jeremy Hooper

Dear New York Assemblyman Dov Hikind: Before you start physically shoving the notoriously anti-gay, anti-Jewish, anti-[insert most anything] protestors from Westboro Baptist Church...


(H/t: Joe.My.God)

...why don't you first take a look in the mirror and ask what you yourself are doing to make the world more discriminatory:

"If you say that gay marriage is kosher, why not respect the wishes of any two consenting adults who fall in love, wish to marry and start a family: brother and sister, father and daughter, mother and son, etc. Incest or other deviant behavior is becoming a legal reality for the future. As my colleague Assemblyman Brodsky said in his address on the issue of gay marriage: If it makes people happy, and it doesn’t hurt anyone else why should we oppose it? And in that same line of thinking, why should we refer to other such relationships, incestuous though they may be, as disgusting? And that is why, in fact, I am considering introducing legislation to decriminalize incest.
...
If we authorize gay marriage in the state of New York, those who want to live and love incestuously will be five steps closer to achieving their goals, as well
."

-Hikind in a letter to the New York Observer

Because while Westboro is a sideshow with signs, you, Mr. Hikind, are a political figure with a platform and a vote. A political figure who has likened relationships like that of New York's City Council speaker to those that might potentially exist between an incestuous brother and sister. A political figure who once opposed a sexual orientation non-discrimination bill by saying "I have no intention of supporting that bill, unless someone changes the laws of the Torah." A political figure whose outrage would be better spent targeting actual civil bias than it is targeting Shirley Phelps-Roper.

The thing is: Westboro actually manages to help America's tolerance level by exposing just how vicious intolerance sometimes gets. Cheap political attacks against same-sex marriage and non-discrimination bills do the exact opposite, fostering casual biases through more subtly coded phrases and more publicly palatable ideas. It's easy to understand why the former unleashes rage; though it's the latter that's forcing gay people to pause their daily lives and fight for fundamental decency.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails