RECENT  POSTS:  » Matt Barber's ever-classy site suggests gay people are literally crushing fellow humans » Bryan Fischer is on to our comic book villain–in-chief » Southern Baptist Theological Seminary's Al Mohler 'can't give' us acceptance; good thing we're not asking » NOM fails to trip up Oregon marriage case » Audio: Tony Perkins equates opposing equality with opposing Nazis » 'WaPo' conservative columnist: 'Strident' marriage equality opponents have lost » If you feel like you hear about another marriage case every day, here's why » If John Eastman's allowed to intervene in Oregon, I submit his endorsement of this very anti-gay book » I apparently can fly; cool, I've always wanted to! » Starving selves to stop others' happiness: Virginia edition  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/08/2010

Video: I was raised in a Methodist family, so you should watch this video

by Jeremy Hooper

Pennsylvania state Rep. David Millard (R-109) is the incumbent. Dan Rae (D) and Tom Anderson (L) are providing the challenge. And just like in so many other races across the country, lesbian, gay, and bisexual people's basic civil freedoms (and by extension those of their respective families) are being used as a test:


[BloomUToday]

Ugh, "I was raised in a Catholic family and I do not support gay marriage" is a complete non sequitur! It's like saying "I was born into an Orthodox Jewish family and I do not support the right to use a civil drivers license on Shabbat." Or "I was raised in an atheist family and I do not support the right of churches to exist." Or "I was raised in a Satan-worshipping family so I do not recognize American flags made of satin." And so on and so on. Because (a) we are talking about the CIVIL MARRIAGE CONTRACT, (b) there are plenty of Catholics who do support equality, and (c) failing to personally support something because of faith views doesn't mean you ban that something in the shared civil society!

Then the other two candidates fall where you'd expect them to in a blue state in 2010. In fact, one of the most striking things about the debate is how straight out of Central Casting both the candidates and the soundbites seem to be. Of course it'll be up to local voters to now rank the positions according to perceived merit. But if we had one hope, it'd be that those merits would be stacked in accordance with the constitution and the fair and free America that we all share, not predominantly based upon the number of communion wafers the candidate did or did not consume as a youth.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails