RECENT  POSTS:  » 2006: When Clinton vocally supported her state moving forward w/ marriage equality but Sanders did not » Where art thou, Jeremy? » Video: Ad for blemish remover/ tourist spot for our new, bettered America » Whether justified or Kim Davis-ed, individualistic rage rarely outplays broader truths » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/08/2010

Video: I was raised in a Methodist family, so you should watch this video

by Jeremy Hooper

Pennsylvania state Rep. David Millard (R-109) is the incumbent. Dan Rae (D) and Tom Anderson (L) are providing the challenge. And just like in so many other races across the country, lesbian, gay, and bisexual people's basic civil freedoms (and by extension those of their respective families) are being used as a test:


[BloomUToday]

Ugh, "I was raised in a Catholic family and I do not support gay marriage" is a complete non sequitur! It's like saying "I was born into an Orthodox Jewish family and I do not support the right to use a civil drivers license on Shabbat." Or "I was raised in an atheist family and I do not support the right of churches to exist." Or "I was raised in a Satan-worshipping family so I do not recognize American flags made of satin." And so on and so on. Because (a) we are talking about the CIVIL MARRIAGE CONTRACT, (b) there are plenty of Catholics who do support equality, and (c) failing to personally support something because of faith views doesn't mean you ban that something in the shared civil society!

Then the other two candidates fall where you'd expect them to in a blue state in 2010. In fact, one of the most striking things about the debate is how straight out of Central Casting both the candidates and the soundbites seem to be. Of course it'll be up to local voters to now rank the positions according to perceived merit. But if we had one hope, it'd be that those merits would be stacked in accordance with the constitution and the fair and free America that we all share, not predominantly based upon the number of communion wafers the candidate did or did not consume as a youth.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails