RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Man who's called for exporting gays goes on CNN to defend Indiana law, earns deserved result » Man who insinuated it's better to be thrown into sea than support homosexuality attended #SB101 signing ceremony » Considering vast (and frankly odd) amount of time he spends talking about us, no wonder Tony Perkins thinks we're 'special' » FRC keeps lying about where majority of Americans stand on marriage equality » Audio: Indiana restaurant owner openly discriminates against gays, glad to have added protection to do so » Indiana legislature, Gov. Pence awaken a fierce, powerful, anti-discrimination giant » Eleven Republican US Sens. give anti-gay conservatives a taste of a near and less divisive future » NOM proudly touts #March4Marriage backers who believe homosexuality 'should be treated by society as immoral, dangerous perversion' » Video: Gee, with compelling videos like this one, I just can't imagine why the anti-gay right is losing in court » #TBT: Even after legal equality, Americans—and particularly religious Americans—struggle to accept certain marriages  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/03/2010

Video: Iowa activist [noun] judges [verb]

by Jeremy Hooper

We keep thinking we're going to wake up from the anti-civic nightmare of Iowa Supreme Court justices having their jobs threatened because of one single (unanimous) opinion out of the thousands that they've taken on in their careers. From the nightmarish idea that certain people's personal faith objections are meant to roll back others' civil rights. The idea that majority votes should decide the application of civil law to a minority population. The idea that "But what about the children?!?!?!" should matter more than the sound arguments that were actually presented to the court. The idea that it's fair to wage well-financed, largely partisan campaigns against judges who can not, will not, and should not enter into the contentious waters of political campaigning. The idea that blatantly misrepresenting the highly respected Sandra Day O'Connor is an acceptable thing to do. The idea that a co-equal branch of America government has somehow been neutered of its responsibilities -- the same exact responsibilities that have settled past civil rights matters, even when public opinion was much more against these matters than current polling is against same-sex marriage.

But unfortunately, the so-called "Iowa For Mob Rule" "Iowa For Freedom" group keeps making more videos showing us that this nightmare is in fact a reality in 2010 America:


Uh huh, right. You're the one being "attacked," Mr. Laudner. That's like a vindictive guest at a grade school sleepover saying that the decision to put itching powder in a classmate's sleeping bag was justified because said classmate had the nerve to complain when his or her mere existence was used as the archetypical antagonist in one of the slumber party's earlier-told ghost stories!

The truth: Mr. Laudner and company's campaign against the Iowa judges goes against everything that the fair and independent judiciary can, is, and should be about. Here's just hoping that a larger portion of the Iowa public will reserve their torches and pitchforks for Halloween night and not election day. Our shared America's treats are counting on the principled rejection of these ghastly unfair tricks!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails