RECENT  POSTS:  » TownHall columnist: 'It's high time for…heterosexual America to stand up' » John Stemberger attacks Canadian scouts: 'A joke' ; 'a group of hippies' » 'Ex-gay' junk science group tells Boy Scouts to keep discriminating; so score one for our side » NOM's summer speaker, Rob Gagnon, calls me 'an abrasive homosexual activist'; my outfit welcomes this badge of honor! » Scout's Dishonor: Gay BSA employee shares pain, hope » Matt Barber accuses distraught New Yorkers of 'politicizing' gay man's murder » 'Heather Has [A New Book Shunning Her] Two Mommies' » Report: IL has votes to free itself from marital discrimination's slipping grips » David Barton: AIDS, meningitis are gay people's 'due penalties' » Are gay boys not boys? A look at the cruelty the equal Scouting opponents engender  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/22/2010

Video: 'Terry Branstad can't have it both ways'

by Jeremy Hooper

Yes! Finally. An apt articulation of law, the role of the independent judiciary in determining the constitutionality of said law, and the reason why the conversation between a unanimous high court decision vs. a public vote on minority rights is not an equally merited tête-à-tête.

***

*Reminder: Branstad sure liked Chief Justice Marsha Ternus when he appointed her back in '93:

July 29, 1993 -- Associated Press
Screen Shot 2010-09-14 At 10.15.43 Am

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails