RECENT  POSTS:  » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/11/2010

'Divisive and problematic': The denial, not the club

by Jeremy Hooper

As a native Nashvillian, this writer knows that Belmont university is widely recognized for its music programs.

As a gay man who left red Tennessee in part because of policies regarding LGBT people, this writer knows that this kind of thing can really strike a negative chord in the minds of acceptance-seeking locals:

Gay students at Belmont University in Nashville thought creating a gay group on campus would be a wonderful idea. But they must've forgot about the school's Christian values, which have Screen Shot 2010-11-11 At 8.52.59 Amsucceeded in playing keep-away for more than two years.

Belmont Bridge Builders was denied recognition as a student group application by university officials. But the organization's president Robbie Maris is left in the dark about why the group has been, News Channel 5 reports, "called divisive and problematic." A pro-life student group didn't have that problem; Belmont Students for Life was approved.

Read more: But A Homosexual Student Group Would Violate Belmont University's Christian Values [Queerty]

Bridge, meet troubled waters.

It's unclear why a group identified as "pro-life" (an unfair political label that applies the other side is "pro-death") was not considered divisive. That is to say: Unclear to those who don't understand double-standard hat LGBT people know all too well.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails