RECENT  POSTS:  » Jonah Goldberg can't see the hornets' nest for its hornets » Video: Male on mail » Jodie Foster in 2013: 'I am'; Jodie Foster in 2014: 'I do' » AFA promotes its new app in only way it knows how » Robert Oscar Lopez says I perform 'psychological operations routine' on him when I quote his own words from his own web site » Matt Barber's ever-classy site suggests gay people are literally crushing fellow humans » Bryan Fischer is on to our comic book villain–in-chief » Southern Baptist Theological Seminary's Al Mohler 'can't give' us acceptance; good thing we're not asking » NOM fails to trip up Oregon marriage case » Audio: Tony Perkins equates opposing equality with opposing Nazis  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/11/2010

Implied criminality: FRC's latest DADT distration

by Jeremy Hooper

Of course they're doing this:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: November 11, 2010

FRC Calls for Department of Defense to Investigate Leaks Regarding Report on Homosexuality in the Military
November 11, 2010

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Family Research Council (FRC) today called upon the Department of Defense (DOD) to publicly disavow and formally investigate leaks to the media regarding the content of a forthcoming report on the issue of homosexuals in the military.

Secretary of Defense Robert Gates formed a Comprehensive Review Working Group (CRWG) in February to "identify the impacts to the force of a repeal of 10 U.S.C. 654" (the 1993 law which codified the military's longstanding ban on homosexual conduct, commonly referred to as "Don't Ask, Don't Tell") and to "provide a plan of action to support the implementation of a repeal of the law."

A front-page Washington Post story today cited an anonymous Pentagon source who reportedly "felt compelled to share the information out of concern that groups opposed to ending the ban would mischaracterize the findings."

Family Research Council President Tony Perkins issued the following statement:

"It's laughable to argue that people who anonymously leak one-sided information to a reporter are less likely to 'mischaracterize the findings' of a ten-month study than are people who wait to read that 370-page study in full.

"We have criticized this study from the outset because the CRWG was forbidden to explore the central question before the country-not how to implement a repeal of the current law, but whether doing so is in the best interest of the armed forces. The surveys of servicemembers and their spouses which were conducted as part of this process shared the same flaw, since they never asked, 'Do you believe the current law should be overturned?'

"Despite this critical flaw, Secretary Gates had at least pledged that the effort would be 'carried out in a professional, thorough and dispassionate manner.' That effort is gravely undermined by leaks to the media which are unprofessional, selective and blatantly biased.

"I urge Secretary Gates to have the DOD Inspector General launch an immediate investigation into the source of these leaks, which have seriously damaged the credibility of the CRWG process.

"This is one more reason why Congress will need to have extensive hearings after the scheduled delivery of the CRWG report on December 1, to thoroughly examine both the substance of its findings and the process by which they were arrived at."

No, no, no, no, no -- this issue has been "thoroughly examined." This report was the compromise. This study was an investigation.

We are not negotiating with Tony Perkins, an "ex-gay" proponent who is on record saying gays are "held captive by the enemy" and engage in conduct that's innately "detrimental to the discipline, trust and combat readiness."!

Period.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails