RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/11/2010

Maggie Gallagher: Putting 'brave' face on basic benefit denial

by Jeremy Hooper

Maggie-Gallagher-SrivastavYesterday we showed you a couple of disconnects in the way Maggie Gallagher carries out her war on gay people's ring fingers. (1) We showed you how she claims she doesn't want to disrespect gay people in general, even though she has a clear record that does just that. (2) We showed you how she works the "They'll call us bigots" meme as if her life depended on it, then denies that she feels that way when the victimization strategy is brought to her attention.

Now let's look at (3): The way the National Organization For Marriage chairperson routinely claims that her fight only pertains to the direct object in her organization's name, even while she calls people "brave" for resisting something as simple and basic as domestic partnership benefits:

At Eastern Kentucky University, a professor named Todd Hartch braved the climate of chilled speech to speak up on his view that domestic partnerships threaten marriage. In the backlash that followed, he felt at first alone and unprotected, but he persevered and soon found many others who shared his concerns among faculty and students. Essentially, he single-handedly sparked a campus-wide discussion of the nature of marriage.

Today
in the Public Discourse, he urges his fellow professors to have the courage of their convictions: Breaking through the academy’s PC silence is necessary and, ultimately, rewarding.
One Brave Professor Urges His Colleagues to Speak Up for Marriage [The Corner]

It's of course not news that people like Maggie oppose even the most basic of rights and protections. Even when they claim otherwise (as the NOM-backed "Yes on 1" campaign opportunistically did in the closing days of Maine's marriage fight), we see right through it. We know that if left to their socially conservative druthers, most members of our organized opposition would gladly sit by and let the world turn an even colder shoulder to LGBT families.

But we do appreciate Maggie's "brave" candor here. This site has always operated under the belief that exposure is as much of a boon for us as it is an Achilles Heel for our political adversaries. The more that people like Maggie publicly get behind the idea that qualified professors should be treated with patent unfairness, the better off we on the side of equality will be.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails