RECENT  POSTS:  » The empty threats phase of the fight » Omaha, NE, resident helps show America what unchecked homo-hostility looks like » Christian developer creates 'Kill The F*ggots' game; parents proven right about video games potentially rotting brains » WND readers: Marriage equality will either not affect us or end us completely » AFA: Gay rights = 'grave threat to our survival as a nation and as a moral and civilized people' » Tony Perkins: Baltimore unrest might be godly punishment for declaring 'moral rights to that which is morally wrong' » The oddity that is the LGBT rights debate circa 2015 » Video: 'Vox' lays out eleven year journey toward a bettered America » Why's the far-right putting a long discarded fear card back in the deck? » 'The newly stigmatized' Maggie Gallagher  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/19/2010

Visitation, ours: 'Here I brought you this flower, dying spouse' remains evangelical hot potato

by Jeremy Hooper

So let's say, for the sake of argument, that social conservatives like Matt Barber are 100% committed to their convictions against sinners as they usually describe them. Does this mean that they'd deny obstetric services to adulterers? Cut off treatment to an overdosing drug addict? Nix life-saving surgery to an alcoholic victim of a booze-induced car accident? Limit hospital visitation only to those whose lie detector results prove that they've borne true witness all year?

Screen Shot 2010-11-19 At 2.54.13 PmOr: Is it only one kind of "sinner" that they care to target? This from the American Family Association's One News Now:

According to the new rule, which takes effect in 60 days, hospitals receiving Medicare or Medicaid money have to inform patients of their right to designate a spouse, domestic partner, family member, or a friend. HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said on Wednesday the rule grants "full and equal" rights to patients to choose who they want by their bedside. But Matt Barber of Liberty Counsel points out they already have the right to choose visitors.
...
[Matt] Barber considers the new rules political theater in trying to create the disingenuous idea that people based on their so-called "sexual orientation" are roundly discriminated against. Faith-based hospitals are not exempt from the rule.

"Certainly there are Catholic hospitals and Baptist hospitals that recognize homosexual behavior as sinful behavior," he points, "and they do not want to take part in affirming homosexual sin under the strong arm of the government."

Some religious hospitals may have to make a decision as to whether to conform to the rules or not accept Medicare patients. Barber says what the Obama administration is doing is casting liberty of conscience aside and forcing acceptance of homosexuality

Feds to hospitals: Go gay...or go broke [ONN]

Honestly, if you're at a medical hospital that holds this as the (or even a) focus, then you might wanna go somewhere else anyway. And this goes not only for gays -- it goes for anyone among us who'd much rather get the fast cure than cast the first stone!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails