RECENT  POSTS:  » Openly anti-gay Chief Justice of AL Supreme Court vows to openly defy marriage equality » AFA's Director of Issues Analysis: LGBT activists possess 'unvarnished energy of Satan himself » Wait, FRC has been able to 'uphold natural marriage'? That's news to all non–cave dwellers! » Because when am I not calling up Fox News personalities to do my bidding? » Anti-equality conservative admits GLAAD CAP is 'smart' and 'effective' » You know what's not presidential? Like at all? » Inevitable justice temporarily delayed in Alabama » Read: Fed. judge strikes Alabama marriage ban; no stay on ruling » Derisively remembering when full equality was in 'Jeopardy!' » When all else fails, demand your letters are capitalized  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

12/02/2010

DADT repeal as a 'positive'

by Jeremy Hooper

In their reactions to the Pentagon report, opponents of Don't Ask Don't Tell repeal keep focusing on the minority percentages who said that changing the policy would produce positive effects or provide the military with added benefit. By which these anti-repeal folks mean to say that lifting the ban won't tangibly enhance the armed forces' fighting power, so therefore there's no reason to do so.

But the point these folks are missing is that "positive" is not really the goal of pro-equality activists. Yes, we who fight for inclusion unabashedly see 201012020847non-discrimination and basic fairness as positives. And yes, we'll see a repeal vote in the Senate as a major positive for American history. And yes, anything less than full repeal will be a negative. But at the end of the day, we don't really think that lifting DADT is going to create some new, Superman-like armed forces whose gay-initiated strength will allow our servicemembers to simply show up and lift an intimidating eyebrow rather than fire a weapon. While we absolutely think DADT repeal is a national security issue and that the discharges have weakened us greatly on both a service personnel and civilian level, we're not really claiming that repeal holds some amazing, on-the-ground positive that will be felt overnight. What we're saying is that bias has placed a contrived, offensive burden on this country -- the overdue lifting of bias will simply take us more level ground, so that maybe soon we can reach new heights.

The actual goal is benign, neutral, and (should be) non-partisan. The goal is to remove contrived controversies. The goal is to fulfill basic American promises, which shouldn't have ever been in question to begin with. The goal is to lift the negative that is discrimination. And the most prominent DADT repeal goal, as with most all other LGBT fights: To become just as boring as everyone else.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails