RECENT  POSTS:  » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win.  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

12/07/2010

Exactly how many gay 'enemies' are currently serving our country?

by Jeremy Hooper

In a piece that WorldNetDaily punctuates with this front-page headline...

Screen Shot 2010-12-07 At 11.29.41 Am

...the Family Research Council's Bob Maginnis says the following about all those leering "enemies" who are serving our country while gay and the good ol' American straighties who'll have to endure even more leering 'moness once DADT is repealed:

"If you have strongly held religious beliefs you'll have cognitive dissonance, and it'll be very difficult to overcome. The military is ignoring privacy concerns, and you'll be told you'll have to room with a homosexual. Your commander will tell you that you will never be propositioned and your roommate will never leer at you, so your deeply held religious beliefs will be of no consequence," Maginnis said.

"Ever since George Washington the military has been programmed to believe homosexuals are disruptive to morale and unit cohesiveness, and are a readiness problem. You have to expunge all those negative thoughts you have about homosexuality and replace them with what you're told by the chain of command about what's right and wrong," he warned.
[SOURCE]

Yeah, Bob? We're going to use George Washington's standard for who should and should not be in the military? Because it ain't just gays who are going to be shutout in that paradigm. Why is the anti-gay bias the one that society of Washington's day apparently got right?

But whatever -- you kids keep talking, FRC. Every day, you're more fully justifying your newfound home on SPLC's list.

**

*Note: The front-page headline in the screen cap is different from the more benign one that WND uses on the story itself. Not sure why. "Enemy'" claims work in mysterious ways.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails