RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

12/29/2010

NOM: So into protecting children, they'll take one kid's pic and blast it 'round the web for political purpo$e$

by Jeremy Hooper

This writer has already said that, if operating on an emotional level looking at the larger movement rather than personal passions, the "FckH8" video campaign never seemed like the smartest of political strategies. And I'm not gonna apologize for that. Because it didn't and still doesn't come across as all that pragmatic, to this site and its writer, at least. (**I recognize and respect that others strongly disagree with me on this)

But that all being said: The National Organization For Marriage's latest effort to exploit and flip the aforementioned video campaign for its own purposes has taken the game to a whole new level of offense. Because look, check out this button ad NOM's created to promote their own cause:

Nom Banner Protectchildren

The boy in the image? Yea, that would be one of the kids from the FCKH8 video. As in: A kid whose pro-equality parent/s presumably know about his involvement. As in: A kid who never asked for NOM's "protection." As in: A kid who is not one of NOM's children, but rather a young member of NOM's pointed opposition. As in: A kid who NOM says is exploited via his sanctioned participation in the FCKH8 campaign, yet feels is being "protected" by this unsanctioned, forcible participation in NOM's own fundraising efforts. How dare Maggie and Brian and company use this kid in this way?!

When I say that the video doesn't strike me as smart politically, I'm speaking only about the language. The cause, the anger, the passion, the sick-of-it tone, the drive to inject humor into the whole thing: That's of course all 100% understandable. Anger, passion, and sick-of-it-iness that is 100% DIRECTED AT NOM AND ITS SELF-APPOINTED JOB PROTECTING SOCIETY AND ITS CHILDREN! So for NOM, the ones who are always crowing about kids being "indoctrinated" in this way or that, to now further their self-appointment by using this one kid as their little victim in need of saving?! Well forget the political strategy attached to FCKH8: This attempt to flip it and exploit the underage participants is just further proof that the only families NOM cares to "protect" are the ones that SCREW=.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails