RECENT  POSTS:  » POTUS believes in fifty-state equality, happy with way it's playing out » But your subjective view of 'real' marriage is factually irrelevant, Ryan » Flip Benham (yes, their dad) reportedly protesting outside NC weddings » TV's Duggar family continues anti-LGBT activism » Caught ya: Far-right's latest marriage 'victim' edited website to make more solid legal case » Read: Wyoming to become our 32nd marriage equality state » GLAAD: Victory is what happens while you're busy making other plans » What fake victimization sounds like in Arizona » Federal judge strikes Arizona's discriminatory marriage ban; marriages should begin today! » NOM's latest desperation: Relying on hearsay James O'Keefe video to smear Democrat for 'secretly' not opposing equality  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

12/29/2010

NOM: So into protecting children, they'll take one kid's pic and blast it 'round the web for political purpo$e$

by Jeremy Hooper

This writer has already said that, if operating on an emotional level looking at the larger movement rather than personal passions, the "FckH8" video campaign never seemed like the smartest of political strategies. And I'm not gonna apologize for that. Because it didn't and still doesn't come across as all that pragmatic, to this site and its writer, at least. (**I recognize and respect that others strongly disagree with me on this)

But that all being said: The National Organization For Marriage's latest effort to exploit and flip the aforementioned video campaign for its own purposes has taken the game to a whole new level of offense. Because look, check out this button ad NOM's created to promote their own cause:

Nom Banner Protectchildren

The boy in the image? Yea, that would be one of the kids from the FCKH8 video. As in: A kid whose pro-equality parent/s presumably know about his involvement. As in: A kid who never asked for NOM's "protection." As in: A kid who is not one of NOM's children, but rather a young member of NOM's pointed opposition. As in: A kid who NOM says is exploited via his sanctioned participation in the FCKH8 campaign, yet feels is being "protected" by this unsanctioned, forcible participation in NOM's own fundraising efforts. How dare Maggie and Brian and company use this kid in this way?!

When I say that the video doesn't strike me as smart politically, I'm speaking only about the language. The cause, the anger, the passion, the sick-of-it tone, the drive to inject humor into the whole thing: That's of course all 100% understandable. Anger, passion, and sick-of-it-iness that is 100% DIRECTED AT NOM AND ITS SELF-APPOINTED JOB PROTECTING SOCIETY AND ITS CHILDREN! So for NOM, the ones who are always crowing about kids being "indoctrinated" in this way or that, to now further their self-appointment by using this one kid as their little victim in need of saving?! Well forget the political strategy attached to FCKH8: This attempt to flip it and exploit the underage participants is just further proof that the only families NOM cares to "protect" are the ones that SCREW=.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails