RECENT  POSTS:  » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs » The religious anti-gay crowd: They never understood the marriage fight; now they don't understand their loss  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

12/22/2010

President/gays don't care about 'normal soldiers', and other theories convenient to Peter LaBarbera

by Jeremy Hooper
Labarbera"Obama and gays have shown that they care more about the sensitivities of gay and lesbian soldiers than they do about the privacy rights of the majority of normal soldiers," ... "I don't really think Obama respects the troops. He respects the gay activists and he wants to implement his agenda as fast as he can -- and that's what he's doing."
-Peter LaBarbera from the SPLC-designated hate group Americans For Truth About Homosexuality [SOURCE]

Gay and lesbian soldiers positioned as the opponent of "normal soldiers"? Thanks for the insight, Pete, but we think we'll get our sensitivity training elsewhere.

Now if you'll excuse us, Pete, we have a victory...

Photo-31

...to celebrate.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails