RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Man who's called for exporting gays goes on CNN to defend Indiana law, earns deserved result » Man who insinuated it's better to be thrown into sea than support homosexuality attended #SB101 signing ceremony » Considering vast (and frankly odd) amount of time he spends talking about us, no wonder Tony Perkins thinks we're 'special' » FRC keeps lying about where majority of Americans stand on marriage equality » Audio: Indiana restaurant owner openly discriminates against gays, glad to have added protection to do so » Indiana legislature, Gov. Pence awaken a fierce, powerful, anti-discrimination giant » Eleven Republican US Sens. give anti-gay conservatives a taste of a near and less divisive future » NOM proudly touts #March4Marriage backers who believe homosexuality 'should be treated by society as immoral, dangerous perversion' » Video: Gee, with compelling videos like this one, I just can't imagine why the anti-gay right is losing in court » #TBT: Even after legal equality, Americans—and particularly religious Americans—struggle to accept certain marriages  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

12/01/2010

The most outrageously annoying thing about DADT repeal...

by Jeremy Hooper

...and the overwrought debate about how it will hurt this or destroy that, is that it's only even a public discussion because the far-right has made it so. Here's what I mean:

They keep saying that cohesion is going to be an issue, Islamic countries are going to look at us unfavorably, and the entire military culture is essentially going to explode if gay soldiers are free to serve without the fear of their sexual orientations threatening their careers. But in a tolerant world without contrived "culture wars," none of this would've ever been at issue to begin with. None of it. LGBT people would be as free to serve in their country's armed forces as they are to serve in elected office, corporate leadership roles, or any other life aspect in which heterosexual people benignly exist without added thought. In such a world, people and groups would surely still oppose homosexuality and still try to "change" gays: Fine! Fair enough! Have a field day! But had the "pro-family values" crowd not kicked and screamed at the idea of tax-paying gays serving their country without persecution, this "soul-saving" could have existed independently from people's military careers. Independently from basic civil equality. Independent from our national security. Now, in December of 2010, we could all be focusing on unemployment writ large rather than unemployment military-specific.

It is not an overstatement to say that it's their own misdeeds for which repeal opponents now wish to hold gay soldiers and allies accountable. They can act like the fears are organic all they want. The anti-gay forces fostered this fallacious flower. Their favorite scapegoats are now paying the price.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails