RECENT  POSTS:  » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win.  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/28/2011

Brian Brown: 'I haven't actually seen the film, but...'

by Jeremy Hooper

Everything you need to know about the National Organization For Marriage can really be summed up by this, the first quarter of Brian Brown's latest e-blast:

201101280822

"Haven't actually seen the film but..." But I'll still criticize the flick. But I'll still frame my entire message around this movie that I admittedly haven't seen. But I'll still make a graphic that flips the movie's title (with an obvious intent of extending the "not all right" concept to all children of gays and lesbians). But I'll still let my preconceived script tell the story rather than see what the actual script says. But I'll still capitalize on the film for my own political gains.

Because why see a film when you can just let others tell you what it's all about? Why see a human population for the rich, diverse part of society that they are, when you can just let others tell you that they're a radical monolith out to destroy marriage and family as we know it?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails