RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/06/2011

GLAAD to MSM: Fallacious discrimination is not punditry

by Jeremy Hooper

We've long said that basic respect and decent treatment aren't concepts towards which we as a society can or should "agree to disagree." And we've long been annoyed with the way the mainstream media likes to present human beings' lives, loves, and intrinsic worth as a two-sided, "Crossfire"-style debate (especially when they feature figures like Peter "let's export and/or criminalize gays" Sprigg, as CNN recently did). Because obviously, a conversation regarding who is and is not supposedly acceptable within our shared spectrum of normalcy is one that transcends politics. Those who castigate LGBT people for virtues no greater than sexual orientation and gender identity are not simply bringing forth a "different viewpoint" -- they are working to "cure" what is not broken.

Now we're happy to say that GLAAD is turning that notion into a national campaign:

Tell CNN to Make a New Year's Resolution:
Keep Away From the Anti-Gay Industry
[GLAAD]

We like this effort. It feels perfectly timed. While we firmly believe in highlighting the anti-gay opposition (and do so everyday), we also reject that point/counterpoint style that is the norm of cable news gay rights debate. That style works for some issues. It does not work for human rights.

And if groups like FRC want to respond to this kind of campaign, then they're eventually going to have to respond to the kinds of things their own fellows have actually said in punditry roles:


*SOURCE: Gays seek immigration reform [Medill Reports]

*SOURCE: [MSNBC]

These folks' abstract messenger-shooting will only go so far. In fact, it's gone too far already, with too little feet/fire-holding.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails