RECENT  POSTS:  » What most people aren't getting about the fake non-troversies of the anti-gay right » 'Weekly Standard' asst. editor equates Tim Cook with man who pits God against him » Michigan pastors make unfortunate lifestyle choice; say they'll go to jail rather than not discriminate » PFOX's Quinlan says SBC leader's opposition to 'reparative therapy' is cruel » That Idaho wedding venue posts new 'rules and regulations'; will still perform non-Christian weddings » Another deceptive thing about NOM's duplicitous anti-Hagan ad » NOM trying to shape Arkansas politics without even learning state's abbreviation » Video: Focus on the Family staffer who calls homosexuality 'particularly evil lie of Satan' hangs out in Chicago's Boystown » Video: Another new NOM ad targets Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AR); uses James O'Keefe video as source » What the heck is 'NOM Victory Fund'?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/25/2011

Iowa marriage ban moves forward (but we refuse to use the word 'advances')

by Jeremy Hooper

By a 13-8 vote, twelve Iowa House Republicans and one Democrat...

 Ga Legislatorimages 256
Rep. Kurt Swaim, D-Bloomfield

...voted to move forward with an amendment that would not only roll back the same-sex marriage right that earned the unanimous support of the state Supreme Court, but one that would also ban civil unions and domestic partnerships. The Des Moines Register has the full story:

Proposed amendment to ban same-sex marriage gets first OK in House [Des Moines Register]

Rep. Swaim said he voted with the GOP because "It’s time for the public debate to begin in earnest." So here, let's get started. Earnestly:

"What makes you think your taxes entitle you to equal citizenship,
Mr. Swaim?"

"Why should we be forced to support your heterosexual lifestyle
choices, Mr. Swaim?"

"Why should kids of gay parents have to learn about a limited marriage law in the state's
public schools, Mr. Swaim?"

"When do I get to vote on whether you and your wife have to legally
divorce, Mr. Swaim?"

"What other Equal Protection/Due Process matters do you think should be left
to majority whims, Mr. Swaim?"

"In your bio, you say you want to "develop long range solutions to the challenges facing the people of Iowa" and
that you wish to ensure "opportunities are expanded for all Iowans." Why shouldn't gays be part of your "all"
or "the people" categories, Mr. Swaim?"

"Should your wife, one of your four children, or one of your five grandchildren need you in a time of emergency,
Mr. Swaim, what makes you think you deserve the kind of easy, benign,
instantly recognizable protections that secure your family bond?"

"Why do you deserve special rights, Mr. Swaim, simply because a fair and independent
high court determined them not to be special, but rather equal?"

"If we allow heterosexual marriage, then what next?"

"Marriage is under attack from radical divorce activists. Why should
opposite-sex couples be allowed to marry, when there are so many doing
damage to the institution?"

Not so fun, is it?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails