RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/12/2011

Maggie calls us gloaters, then pulls post. Which kind of makes us wanna gloat, frankly.

by Jeremy Hooper

For some reason NOM abruptly pulled this post from Maggie Gallagher (which referenced this here website as the "gloaters"):

Screen Shot 2011-01-12 At 10.30.01 Am
(*Thanks to Bob Barnes for capturing it!)

Interesting that she responds to this one thing we wrote, with a frivolous aside about the supposed typicality of our supposed "gloating," considering we've directly taken on her logic in any number of ways over the past six years. Guess this one matter was easier to spin than the time we caught her calling homosexuality "unfortunate" and said that gays can "always control [their] behavior" (to name but one instance). But I digress.

Since we were able to reclaim this removed post, let's look at Maggie's stated claim. Maggie says that even though her ideas still ended up getting trounced in the Economist debate, she's actually glad because of the change that occurred. This change:

6A00D8341C503453Ef0148C778D0C3970C

That's what she's so happy about: That through NOM and other group's GOTV actions she was able to grow opposition by 19%, getting it all the way to 37%? Well okay, Maggie, if you want to claim that as progress, then go for it. Though you should know: It is less than the The Cool Moose Party candidate for Rhode Island's Lt. Governor ;-).

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails