RECENT  POSTS:  » No, you really don't seem to know what tyranny is, Jerry Cox » Vatican's #Humanum event meant to paint gay families as 'evil' and 'obscene,' admits invited guest » Read: Federal judge calls MS's marriage ban what it is: discriminatory » Yet another federal judge accurately notes crude discrimination within Arkansas' marriage ban » Prominent conservative outlet equates LGBT activists with Nazi paramilitary » New pledge: Conservative pastors choose to separate selves from civil marriage » Read: ADF creates fake 'victim' superbook; misapplies business matters to churches » P&G reaches out to pro-discrimination activist, learns it made right choice » In prep for Pope's 2015 visit, World Meeting of Families readies gay stigma, exclusion » Today in ambition: NOM cofounder vows to fight marriage equality for 100 years  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/03/2011

#SmallTentsYouCanBelieveIn

by Jeremy Hooper

Via NOM's live Twittering of today's Republican National Committee chairmanship debate, the anti-equality group rounds up the pertinent marriage soundbites offered by the RNC's five candidates:

Screen Shot 2011-01-03 At 1.46.15 Pm
SOURCE: @NOMTweets [Twitter]

*ALSO:
Joe now has video of the candidates' answers.

Basing civil marriage views on personal faith, U.S. distinction, so-called traditional values, one-sided ideals, and flawed procreation arguments? Well, that's certainly novel. But we'll stick the Constitution, thank you very much.

***

*SEE ALSO: The pre-debate interviews wherein each of the candidates (plus now-withdrawn candidate Gentry Collins but minus current candidate Maria Cino) expounded on their discriminatory outlooks:

Ann Wagner

Saul Anuzis, Gentry Collins, and Reince Priebus

Michael Steele

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails