RECENT  POSTS:  » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama » In 2008, the AFA was the same on LGBT rights as President Obama; and I was a flying unicorn » The Hitching Post plot thickens in a truly remarkable way » On Rivka, Robert and their dirty, self-victimizing, anti-intellectual blame game » POTUS believes in fifty-state equality, happy with way it's playing out » But your subjective view of 'real' marriage is factually irrelevant, Ryan » Flip Benham (yes, their dad) reportedly protesting outside NC weddings  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/03/2011

#SmallTentsYouCanBelieveIn

by Jeremy Hooper

Via NOM's live Twittering of today's Republican National Committee chairmanship debate, the anti-equality group rounds up the pertinent marriage soundbites offered by the RNC's five candidates:

Screen Shot 2011-01-03 At 1.46.15 Pm
SOURCE: @NOMTweets [Twitter]

*ALSO:
Joe now has video of the candidates' answers.

Basing civil marriage views on personal faith, U.S. distinction, so-called traditional values, one-sided ideals, and flawed procreation arguments? Well, that's certainly novel. But we'll stick the Constitution, thank you very much.

***

*SEE ALSO: The pre-debate interviews wherein each of the candidates (plus now-withdrawn candidate Gentry Collins but minus current candidate Maria Cino) expounded on their discriminatory outlooks:

Ann Wagner

Saul Anuzis, Gentry Collins, and Reince Priebus

Michael Steele

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails