RECENT  POSTS:  » Where art thou, Jeremy? » Video: Ad for blemish remover/ tourist spot for our new, bettered America » Whether justified or Kim Davis-ed, individualistic rage rarely outplays broader truths » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »



by Jeremy Hooper

Via NOM's live Twittering of today's Republican National Committee chairmanship debate, the anti-equality group rounds up the pertinent marriage soundbites offered by the RNC's five candidates:

Screen Shot 2011-01-03 At 1.46.15 Pm
SOURCE: @NOMTweets [Twitter]

Joe now has video of the candidates' answers.

Basing civil marriage views on personal faith, U.S. distinction, so-called traditional values, one-sided ideals, and flawed procreation arguments? Well, that's certainly novel. But we'll stick the Constitution, thank you very much.


*SEE ALSO: The pre-debate interviews wherein each of the candidates (plus now-withdrawn candidate Gentry Collins but minus current candidate Maria Cino) expounded on their discriminatory outlooks:

Ann Wagner

Saul Anuzis, Gentry Collins, and Reince Priebus

Michael Steele

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper

Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy

Related Posts with Thumbnails