RECENT  POSTS:  » In prep for Pope's 2015 visit, World Meeting of Families readies gay stigma, exclusion » Today in ambition: NOM cofounder vows to fight marriage equality for 100 years » Video: Mississippian who made soldier his lifestyle choice seeks freedom based on unchosen orientation » One of America's most anti-gay organizations rallies for the Duggars; because of course they would » Photo: Stop! Turn around! Don't let NOM force you onto the dead-end pier that is their cause! » One day, two country singers—zero closets » Fringe pro-discrimination group thinks it can stop companies from sponsoring HRC event; adorable » Video: Josh Duggar promoting civil inequality for thousands of grown kids (and counting) » Brian Brown's focus on Kansas, Gov. Brownback shows how much of a political game this is for him » Tiny fraction of North Carolina magistrates choose to free up their days rather than serve local gays  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/05/2011

Wow, FoTF: How's your headline gonna read when equality actually/inevitably *does* win?

by Jeremy Hooper

Yesterday's Prop 8 development was basically procedural. Largely unemotional for both sides. A setback in terms of time, but not a victory or a loss for either side in terms of the law (and in fact, groups like NOM actually seem to like the decisions).

Oh, but leave it to Focus on the Family, ever on a quest to make the 9th Circuit Court seem radical and out of touch with America, to turn the court's process into further slaps in their faces. This is seriously the headline the group's using for its coverage of yesterday's developments:

Screen Shot 2011-01-05 At 8.57.07 Am
[SOURCE]
(*Note: The religious freedom part refers to a separate case revolving around the Mt Soledad cross.
So only the "undermines marriage" part affects us.)

Wow -- we know these Colorado Springs "culture warriors" are all kinds of caught up in the unflattering 9th Circuit portrait-painting that they've taken on as a past time in recent months. But to say yesterday's decision "undermines marriage"? Why that's kind of like saying Bob and Joe's benign happiness under the civil government to which they contribute taxes somehow destroys heterosexuals' marriages.

Oh wait a minute...

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails