RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Fake news calls out fake victims » AG Holder: Whichever way SCOTUS goes, work continues » Video: Powerful 'Families Are Forever' trailer (watch and share!) » Republican does what all GOP candidates will eventually do (i.e. accept gays); feels MassResistance's wrath (i.e. tsk-tsking blog post) » NOM versus Jennifer Aniston's three-year-old opinion » 'Discriminating with the Stars': Reality TV personality to head FRC's Action arm » FRC back to scanning Google Images for drag queens; ENDA must be back in news » NOM EXPOSED: NOM & Co. trying to create an iconic image to rival HRC's » 'Gays against gay marriage' = the new 'ex-gay' » Of course Bryan Fischer's bizarre obsession with homosexuality is *our* fault (#AlwaysTheVictim)  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

02/01/2011

Two Iowa lawmakers: We [sit] in [non-defense] of this bill

by Jeremy Hooper

If we had to pick the most telling moment from today's Iowa House debate on marriage (in)equality, it would have to be the moment when Rep. Nathan Willems (D-29) asked two of his most outspokenly gay-banny colleagues...

Screen Shot 2011-02-01 At 4.07.30 Pm

...Reps. Pearson (R-42) and Massie (R-74) to yield for questions on the bill, and both flatly REFUSED to do so:

Because, why, you know? Everyone's familiar that popular saying: "With great power comes great responsibility -- unless it involves justifying your choice to rollback court-tested Equal Protection for your gay constituents via a spiteful majority vote."

***

***For those who *did* talk in favor of equality: LISTEN to archive audio from the debate.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails