RECENT  POSTS:  » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/04/2011

Concerned Women defend us from jilted brides, disco suits

by Jeremy Hooper

What do we think Concerned Women For America's concerned staffers are trying to say with this image?

Screen Shot 2011-03-04 At 9.51.35 Am
[CWFA]

That marriage equality will lead straight grooms to run off with their Best Men?

That gays are going to bound into churches and disrupt ceremonies?

That the relative non-inclusion of chest hair, gold chains, and spread collars into American weddings is only being maintained by DOMA's provided constraints?

We're genuinely curious.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails