RECENT  POSTS:  » What most people aren't getting about the fake non-troversies of the anti-gay right » 'Weekly Standard' asst. editor equates Tim Cook with man who pits God against him » Michigan pastors make unfortunate lifestyle choice; say they'll go to jail rather than not discriminate » PFOX's Quinlan says SBC leader's opposition to 'reparative therapy' is cruel » That Idaho wedding venue posts new 'rules and regulations'; will still perform non-Christian weddings » Another deceptive thing about NOM's duplicitous anti-Hagan ad » NOM trying to shape Arkansas politics without even learning state's abbreviation » Video: Focus on the Family staffer who calls homosexuality 'particularly evil lie of Satan' hangs out in Chicago's Boystown » Video: Another new NOM ad targets Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AR); uses James O'Keefe video as source » What the heck is 'NOM Victory Fund'?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/04/2011

Concerned Women defend us from jilted brides, disco suits

by Jeremy Hooper

What do we think Concerned Women For America's concerned staffers are trying to say with this image?

Screen Shot 2011-03-04 At 9.51.35 Am
[CWFA]

That marriage equality will lead straight grooms to run off with their Best Men?

That gays are going to bound into churches and disrupt ceremonies?

That the relative non-inclusion of chest hair, gold chains, and spread collars into American weddings is only being maintained by DOMA's provided constraints?

We're genuinely curious.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails