RECENT  POSTS:  » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win.  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/04/2011

Concerned Women defend us from jilted brides, disco suits

by Jeremy Hooper

What do we think Concerned Women For America's concerned staffers are trying to say with this image?

Screen Shot 2011-03-04 At 9.51.35 Am
[CWFA]

That marriage equality will lead straight grooms to run off with their Best Men?

That gays are going to bound into churches and disrupt ceremonies?

That the relative non-inclusion of chest hair, gold chains, and spread collars into American weddings is only being maintained by DOMA's provided constraints?

We're genuinely curious.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails