« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »
03/23/2011
Ninth Circuit rains on CA's spring wedding season
Towle has the scoop:
"Filed order (STEPHEN R. REINHARDT, MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS and N. RANDY SMITH) Having considered all of the factors set forth in Nken v. Holder, 129 S. Ct. 1749, 1756 (2009), and all of the facts and circumstances surrounding Plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the stay pending appeal, as well as the standard for vacatur set forth in Southeast Alaska Conservation Council v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 472 F.3d 1097, 1101 (9th Cir. 2006), we deny Plaintiffs’ motion at this time. [7691622] (KKW)
BREAKING: Ninth Circuit Denies Prop 8 Plaintiffs Request to Lift Stay [Towle]
Your thoughts
comments powered by Disqus
