RECENT  POSTS:  » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/08/2011

NOM routinely denies personal animus. Their commenters say otherwise

by Jeremy Hooper

Screen-Shot-2011-03-07-At-5.25.55-PmLast night, the National Organization For Marriage wrote a post that does nothing more than condemn the existence of the charming new children's book, My Uncle's Wedding:

After Gay Marriage: What Next? CA Senator honors children's book on SSM [NOM]

As someone who is an uncle and who has had a wedding with loving nephews involved, I took personal offense. For my marriage. For my family. For my people.

But forget me and forget even marriage. Because now, the organization's own commenters will bear out how much further than "protecting marriage" the NOM mindset really goes:

201103081105
[SOURCE]

My Uncle's a Diseased, Communist, Brainwasher? Go ahead an make that ad, NOM. We insist!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails