RECENT  POSTS:  » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/24/2011

Olson & Boies have 'impressive streak of losses'? What, at Scrabble or something?

by Jeremy Hooper

This is the National Organization For Marriage's big talking point regarding the Ninth Circuit's decision to not lift the stay (thus not letting CA gay couples get married) while the Prop 8 federal trial continues on appeal:

"This is good news for the people of California--and congratulations to the Dream Team of David Boies and Ted Olson for continuing their impressive streak of losses in actions not in Judge Walker's courtroom," said Brian Brown, president of NOM. [SOURCE]

What an astounding crock! Because where is this "impressive streak" of losses of which Brian Brown speaks? Olson and Boies' goal in the Prop 8 trial has been the elimination of that unconstitutional ban itself. Step one of that mission was legendarily accomplished, much to NOM's dismay. Yesterday's decision regarding the stay is mostly procedural -- about process and precedent, not at all a consideration of the merits of marriage equality. It's something those of us on the right side of history see as continued injustice, yes. And we would've liked to have seen Californian gays treated with the dignity they deserve. But this stay decision came about because of the hangups of this kind of appeals process, not any sort of bad lawyering on Olson and Boies' part (or any great deed on the proponents' side).

Once again we have NOM trying to change a reality: To create a false narrative rather than deal with the one called reality. So okay, let them. But if their strategy is to inflate largely procedural setbacks like yesterday's so that those kinds of decisions are on par with historic victories like Judge Vaughn Walker's Aug. 2010 ruling? Well that's kind of like comparing the benefits of eating one apple with the rewards of investing in Apple stock in the year 2000. The former might satiate an afternoon hunger pang, but the latter will secure a much brighter future.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails