RECENT  POSTS:  » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something.  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/07/2011

Ark. high court: Believe it or not, 'the people' don't have right to ban at whim

by Jeremy Hooper

Another blow to the voters' "right" to stifle other' civil rights:

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) -- The Arkansas Supreme Court has upheld a decision to strike down a state law barring gay couples and other unmarried people living together from serving as adoptive or foster parents.
Ark. court strikes down law barring gay adoptions [AP via WGME]

State voters made the unfortunate choice to back the discriminatory measure in '08, rallied by local conservatives in retaliation against this very same state Supreme Court for opening the door to gay and lesbian fostering. So this is another instance of a court doing exactly what it should do: Holding in checking the people's will as it applies to the fair execution of law and policy.

So in short: Expect "activist judge" claims within the hour.

***

*UPDATE: The opinion:

Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Cole

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails