RECENT  POSTS:  » Your anti-LGBT movement at work: Viciously denigrating stock photos of gay families » Maggie Gallagher's latest shows what a disservice she did to the *civil* marriage debate » Brian Brown apparently buying a new dinette set, misapplies purchase to marriage debate » Focus on the Family: Marriage equality activists are 'tyrants'; opponents are 'slaves' » Read: Zack Ford smacks back Ryan Anderson's love of tax-subsidized discrimination » God Hates Fads: Radical Bay State group pretends homosexuality is like skinny jeans » But does the Archbishop even believe in gay? » Video: Move over aliens, plagues, Sharknados—it's committed gays who'll soon kill Western Civilization » Nine former water-carriers for 'ex-gayness' join all credible scientists in denouncing 'ex-gay' propaganda » The operative word is 'yet'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/07/2011

Ark. high court: Believe it or not, 'the people' don't have right to ban at whim

by Jeremy Hooper

Another blow to the voters' "right" to stifle other' civil rights:

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) -- The Arkansas Supreme Court has upheld a decision to strike down a state law barring gay couples and other unmarried people living together from serving as adoptive or foster parents.
Ark. court strikes down law barring gay adoptions [AP via WGME]

State voters made the unfortunate choice to back the discriminatory measure in '08, rallied by local conservatives in retaliation against this very same state Supreme Court for opening the door to gay and lesbian fostering. So this is another instance of a court doing exactly what it should do: Holding in checking the people's will as it applies to the fair execution of law and policy.

So in short: Expect "activist judge" claims within the hour.

***

*UPDATE: The opinion:

Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Cole

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails