RECENT  POSTS:  » Read: NOM's guide to pressuring lawmakers to ban marriages (while pretending you're doing something good and positive instead) » Full trailer: 'The Normal Heart' » Vintage Clinton era oppo memo perhaps even more relevant today » Concerned Women For America advises churches to lockdown exclusionary marriage views » Video: What does conservative columnist Cal Thomas see as America's biggest threat? Take a guess. » Correcting NOM's fallacious fear graphic » Gee, Bryan, can't understand why federal courts are rejecting you gay = incest view » Former NOM sr. associate admits shift: Moving away from intellectual arguments, focusing on spiritual » Prop 8 defense attorney now planning lesbian daughter's wedding » If you can't afford your event, NOM, perhaps you should just cancel  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/27/2011

FRC calls us 'spineless bullies'; we call on FRC to spin less bull + lies

by Jeremy Hooper

Screen Shot 2011-04-27 At 8.29.12 AmIn their daily "Washington Update," Family Research Council staffers are using King & Spalding's ultimately principled decision to step away from the DOMA case (i.e. not defend discrimination for gay Americans) to brand all equality advocates with a "spineless" label:

"This firestorm is exposing homosexual activists for what they are--spineless bullies." [FRC]

Right. So let's take a sec and unpack this:

Spineless: Early- and mid- 20th century activists who risked all they had in order to be heard? Kids who come out in conservative parts of the country at young ages? Couples who let the American public into their homes so as to advance the equality cause? People who dare to live a life of truth, even if come comes at the expense of a life of ease? Those who cull their arguments from deep research rather than rely on preconceived scripts?

Bullies: American taxpayers who rise up against the idea that their citizenship is second-class? People who put more stock in the informed opinions of judges than they do in the whims of a bare majority vote? Those who keep their religious beliefs separate from their civil life, realizing that the former is varied and changing while the latter should be as unified as possible? Activists who push for simple things like open service, employment non-discrimination, equal marriage, and fair immigration practices rather than discriminatory measures that inscribe discrimination into governing documents?


Is this really what the gay rights "firestorm" is revealing to the American public -- or is that FRC officials think if they bully the discourse long enough, a complacent nation will eventually lend invertebrate credence to their noise onslaught?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails