RECENT  POSTS:  » Court upholds Houston's Equal Rights Ordinance » Maggie Gallagher won't toast you while you trap your spouse in sin » NOM pre-spins its likely low #March4Marriage attendance » 'Children of gays' lawyer to SCOTUS: Ban same-sex marriage so bisexuals will marry heterosexually » Audio: Ryan T. Anderson says sexual orientation speaks to content of character; links it to sadomasochism, polyamory » WHOA: FRC 'reediting' all those heinous fasting-for-marriage prayers I've been showing you!! » Man who dedicates his life to fighting marriage equality, gay parenting: 'I don't work to harm others' » FRC's eighth day of fasting-for-discrimination: Uses passage about forced drowning to condemn gay parents » NOM: Marriage is some creepy number that looks like it's about to behead one spouse » Desperate anti-gay movement's latest attempt to dehumanize: Gay unions harm straight kids  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/27/2011

Is NOM really this obtuse?

by Jeremy Hooper

Check out how America's most prominent house of marital discrimination is phrasing Joe Solmonese's comments about basic nondiscrimination:

Screen Shot 2011-04-27 At 3.02.50 Pm
[SOURCE]

Uhm, did Joe say anything about marriage in regards to education? He talked about the general lack of right to "discriminate against certain groups of people." Does NOM really have a problem with that kind of thing being encouraged in public school (as it often is and should be, regardless of state/federal marriage law)?

Or perhaps the real question: Has NOM gotten so wrapped up in the policy of using "gay marriage" as a stand-in for when they really mean general LGBT antipathy that they no longer even recognize the difference?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails