RECENT  POSTS:  » Joseph Farah still clueless about nondiscrimination law » Hobby Lobby president to join extremely anti-gay activists at 'Star Spangled' event » FRC's Sprigg admits his side put up 'weak defense' in 7th Circuit » Photo: The latest totally convincing, in no way silly attempt at a meme from anti-gay Ruth Institute » AFA's Fischer: Time for Christians to 'get up in somebody's grill' like Jesus would » GLAAD: The World Congress of Families sparks protests in Australia. Let's examine why. » GLAAD: NOM cofounder: 'Hard to see... the logical stopping place' between gay-affirming, murder-affirming Christians » 'Nonpartisan' NOM's entrenched Republicanism again showing » GLAAD: His other tactics failing, NOM president turns to anti-trans fear-mongering » AFA's Bryan Fischer: Diversity is 'most sinister and dangerous lie'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/27/2011

Is NOM really this obtuse?

by Jeremy Hooper

Check out how America's most prominent house of marital discrimination is phrasing Joe Solmonese's comments about basic nondiscrimination:

Screen Shot 2011-04-27 At 3.02.50 Pm
[SOURCE]

Uhm, did Joe say anything about marriage in regards to education? He talked about the general lack of right to "discriminate against certain groups of people." Does NOM really have a problem with that kind of thing being encouraged in public school (as it often is and should be, regardless of state/federal marriage law)?

Or perhaps the real question: Has NOM gotten so wrapped up in the policy of using "gay marriage" as a stand-in for when they really mean general LGBT antipathy that they no longer even recognize the difference?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails