RECENT  POSTS:  » Your anti-LGBT movement at work: Viciously denigrating stock photos of gay families » Maggie Gallagher's latest shows what a disservice she did to the *civil* marriage debate » Brian Brown apparently buying a new dinette set, misapplies purchase to marriage debate » Focus on the Family: Marriage equality activists are 'tyrants'; opponents are 'slaves' » Read: Zack Ford smacks back Ryan Anderson's love of tax-subsidized discrimination » God Hates Fads: Radical Bay State group pretends homosexuality is like skinny jeans » But does the Archbishop even believe in gay? » Video: Move over aliens, plagues, Sharknados—it's committed gays who'll soon kill Western Civilization » Nine former water-carriers for 'ex-gayness' join all credible scientists in denouncing 'ex-gay' propaganda » The operative word is 'yet'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/27/2011

Is NOM really this obtuse?

by Jeremy Hooper

Check out how America's most prominent house of marital discrimination is phrasing Joe Solmonese's comments about basic nondiscrimination:

Screen Shot 2011-04-27 At 3.02.50 Pm
[SOURCE]

Uhm, did Joe say anything about marriage in regards to education? He talked about the general lack of right to "discriminate against certain groups of people." Does NOM really have a problem with that kind of thing being encouraged in public school (as it often is and should be, regardless of state/federal marriage law)?

Or perhaps the real question: Has NOM gotten so wrapped up in the policy of using "gay marriage" as a stand-in for when they really mean general LGBT antipathy that they no longer even recognize the difference?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails