RECENT  POSTS:  » GOP pollster Luntz to Heritage Foundation's Anderson: 'Gay marriage is harmless' » Read: Federal court judge rules against Colorado's discriminatory marriage ban » You guys, will you please pipe down so Sen. Rubio can dismantle your deserved freedoms? » 'Mask is coming off' LGBTs, says man who vowed to export and/or criminalize LGBTs » Exxon, infamous holdout on fair and decent employment protections, could be running out of options » Oregon baker who refused same-sex wedding cake bakes for 'ex-gay' org » PFOX rebrands; into group play, seemingly » Audio: Listen to this ADF spinmeister and his anti-gay spin » Report: US District judge won't deny justice to gay Coloradans; might delay it, though » AFA to POTUS: End your 'love affair with homosexuality,' give anti-gay Christians entitlement instead  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/27/2011

Is NOM really this obtuse?

by Jeremy Hooper

Check out how America's most prominent house of marital discrimination is phrasing Joe Solmonese's comments about basic nondiscrimination:

Screen Shot 2011-04-27 At 3.02.50 Pm
[SOURCE]

Uhm, did Joe say anything about marriage in regards to education? He talked about the general lack of right to "discriminate against certain groups of people." Does NOM really have a problem with that kind of thing being encouraged in public school (as it often is and should be, regardless of state/federal marriage law)?

Or perhaps the real question: Has NOM gotten so wrapped up in the policy of using "gay marriage" as a stand-in for when they really mean general LGBT antipathy that they no longer even recognize the difference?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails