RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/07/2011

NOM's official Facebook moderator vs 'homos adopting children'

by Jeremy Hooper

More "protect marriage" love from NOM's official Facebook page, as backed by one of that site's official moderators:

Screen Shot 2011-04-07 At 1.32.54 Pm
Screen Shot 2011-04-07 At 1.33.08 Pm
Screen Shot 2011-04-07 At 1.33.24 Pm
SOURCE: NOM's official Facebook page

Defend DOMA? Sounds like we need to defend basic gay existences. From NOM.

***

*EARLIER: NOM knocks pro-gay Facebook spoof; we see that indie effort and raise them their official one [G-A-Y]

***

**BTW: I've had an exchange with someone who tries to justify these comments by saying they are from an old moderator, not the current one. THAT. DOES. NOT. MATTER. The point is that (A) NOM chose to adopt this page as their own, then (B) Either directly or indirectly chose the site's moderators. When an org. chooses people to moderate a site, with official ID and iconography attached, that person or persons represents the voice of the org. That is the role.

So right now, for anyone who stumbles on this still active thread about "homos adopting children" (where a posting was made on Monday of this week), there is a person, IDed with NOM graphics and title, posting about their opposition to gay-headed families. That is what matters!

When NOM acquired this Facebook page, many of us were shocked, because we knew how incendiary that page got. But NOM purchased it seemingly *because* of its content, not despite. It is not theirs, in full.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails