RECENT  POSTS:  » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs » The religious anti-gay crowd: They never understood the marriage fight; now they don't understand their loss  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/07/2011

NOM's official Facebook moderator vs 'homos adopting children'

by Jeremy Hooper

More "protect marriage" love from NOM's official Facebook page, as backed by one of that site's official moderators:

Screen Shot 2011-04-07 At 1.32.54 Pm
Screen Shot 2011-04-07 At 1.33.08 Pm
Screen Shot 2011-04-07 At 1.33.24 Pm
SOURCE: NOM's official Facebook page

Defend DOMA? Sounds like we need to defend basic gay existences. From NOM.

***

*EARLIER: NOM knocks pro-gay Facebook spoof; we see that indie effort and raise them their official one [G-A-Y]

***

**BTW: I've had an exchange with someone who tries to justify these comments by saying they are from an old moderator, not the current one. THAT. DOES. NOT. MATTER. The point is that (A) NOM chose to adopt this page as their own, then (B) Either directly or indirectly chose the site's moderators. When an org. chooses people to moderate a site, with official ID and iconography attached, that person or persons represents the voice of the org. That is the role.

So right now, for anyone who stumbles on this still active thread about "homos adopting children" (where a posting was made on Monday of this week), there is a person, IDed with NOM graphics and title, posting about their opposition to gay-headed families. That is what matters!

When NOM acquired this Facebook page, many of us were shocked, because we knew how incendiary that page got. But NOM purchased it seemingly *because* of its content, not despite. It is not theirs, in full.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails