RECENT  POSTS:  » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win.  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/25/2011

NY 'protect marriage' group confuses ring finger for trigger finger; basic equality retains the middle

by Jeremy Hooper

This is how the so-called New Yorker's Family Research Foundation (which also operates as New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms) is choosing to visually represent the threat we gay New Yorkers supposedly pose to the institution of marriage:

Screen Shot 2011-04-24 At 10.49.40 Pm
[SOURCE: NYFRF]

You get it? They mean to say we're going to take out marriage. As in shoot it. Dead. With a gun.

Though really, groups like this are to be blame if this metaphorical marriage murder ever comes to be. I mean, if they hadn't left out the grammatical gun they've so forcefully and deliberately put to the head of fair discourse regarding this issue, then no phantom gay militant would've even had access to such a rhetorical revolver, much less a need.

***

*Scenes from an actual NY (by way of CT) marriage: Nothing killed but several bottles of wine: 6/13/09: This is what marriage equality looks like [G-A-Y]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails