RECENT  POSTS:  » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win.  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/19/2011

Rick Perry's false, derisive choice begets equally tuned blog post

by Jeremy Hooper

Is this non-sequitur really something esteemed congressional hearing witness Maggie Gallagher supports?!

Screen Shot 2011-04-19 At 7.02.16 Am
[SOURCE]

Gays framed as anti-opportunity. Gay weddings, which only bring more employment and more economic opportunity, presented as somehow anti-jobs. The whole tone = complete and utter denigration.

But then again, marital bias is Maggie's own, personal economic development plan. Why wouldn't she pit gays against opportunity, when doing so has kept her in house and home for so many years now?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails