RECENT  POSTS:  » No, you really don't seem to know what tyranny is, Jerry Cox » Vatican's #Humanum event meant to paint gay families as 'evil' and 'obscene,' admits invited guest » Read: Federal judge calls MS's marriage ban what it is: discriminatory » Yet another federal judge accurately notes crude discrimination within Arkansas' marriage ban » Prominent conservative outlet equates LGBT activists with Nazi paramilitary » New pledge: Conservative pastors choose to separate selves from civil marriage » Read: ADF creates fake 'victim' superbook; misapplies business matters to churches » P&G reaches out to pro-discrimination activist, learns it made right choice » In prep for Pope's 2015 visit, World Meeting of Families readies gay stigma, exclusion » Today in ambition: NOM cofounder vows to fight marriage equality for 100 years  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/19/2011

Rick Perry's false, derisive choice begets equally tuned blog post

by Jeremy Hooper

Is this non-sequitur really something esteemed congressional hearing witness Maggie Gallagher supports?!

Screen Shot 2011-04-19 At 7.02.16 Am
[SOURCE]

Gays framed as anti-opportunity. Gay weddings, which only bring more employment and more economic opportunity, presented as somehow anti-jobs. The whole tone = complete and utter denigration.

But then again, marital bias is Maggie's own, personal economic development plan. Why wouldn't she pit gays against opportunity, when doing so has kept her in house and home for so many years now?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails