RECENT  POSTS:  » Joseph Farah still clueless about nondiscrimination law » Hobby Lobby president to join extremely anti-gay activists at 'Star Spangled' event » FRC's Sprigg admits his side put up 'weak defense' in 7th Circuit » Photo: The latest totally convincing, in no way silly attempt at a meme from anti-gay Ruth Institute » AFA's Fischer: Time for Christians to 'get up in somebody's grill' like Jesus would » GLAAD: The World Congress of Families sparks protests in Australia. Let's examine why. » GLAAD: NOM cofounder: 'Hard to see... the logical stopping place' between gay-affirming, murder-affirming Christians » 'Nonpartisan' NOM's entrenched Republicanism again showing » GLAAD: His other tactics failing, NOM president turns to anti-trans fear-mongering » AFA's Bryan Fischer: Diversity is 'most sinister and dangerous lie'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/19/2011

Rick Perry's false, derisive choice begets equally tuned blog post

by Jeremy Hooper

Is this non-sequitur really something esteemed congressional hearing witness Maggie Gallagher supports?!

Screen Shot 2011-04-19 At 7.02.16 Am
[SOURCE]

Gays framed as anti-opportunity. Gay weddings, which only bring more employment and more economic opportunity, presented as somehow anti-jobs. The whole tone = complete and utter denigration.

But then again, marital bias is Maggie's own, personal economic development plan. Why wouldn't she pit gays against opportunity, when doing so has kept her in house and home for so many years now?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails