Sorry, @mbwithcrc, but considering your job is to royally screw our own marriages...

RECENT	POSTS:	» Losing 'On My Honor' coalition says #BoyScouts can no longer use 'timeless values' phrase in good faith » Tony Perkins on #BoyScouts vote (hint: he isn't happy) » BREAKING: #BoyScouts lift the ban on gay scouts!!!!!!!! » Why I care so much about the Boy Scouts vote » New Jersey's leading 'family' group posts truly nasty video equating gays with adulterers, alcoholics » A #BoyScouts dialogue with Manhattan Declaration's Exec. Director » Um, actually there is a right side of history; obviously » Discriminación! » New ad: One of America's most hostile anti-gay groups asks BSA Delegates to make horrible mistake » Boy Scouts president cuts through the noise: 'Let in gay boys'

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/28/2011

by Jeremy Hooper

We appreciate and even agree with the sentiment in this retweet:

Screen Shot 2011-04-28 At 2.18.29 Pm

But considering it comes from the press representative for the National Organization For Marriage...

201104281420

...you'll have to forgive us if we're not too sympathetic about her seeing "too much coverage" when it comes to certain kinds of marriages. Because daily we watch as Ms. Hutchins press releases her/NOM's desires to see our own unions forcibly annulled. And this will presumably still be the case, even when the camera crews have long left Trafalagar Square. That's waaaaaaaaaay more pervasive than Natalie Morales journalistically delving into whether or not Kate Middleton will wear flowing tendrils of an up-do.

space