RECENT  POSTS:  » Maggie Gallagher's new gig » How do you even talk with a movement that insists we 'cannot coexist'? » Sen. Manchin picks odd way to (D-istinguish) himself » Photo: Before city council votes on nondiscrimination, Charlotte anti-LGBT activists frame us as 'Homo-Nazis' » AG Holder: 'Marriage equality is an idea whose time has come.' » Viciously anti-gay activist Scott Lively to help us show SCOTUS what animus looks like; thanks, doll! » Audio: NOM prez equates his anti-gay fight with defeating slavery, conquering 'evils that were occurring in the Roman empire' » SCOTUS deals another blow to NOM; more to surely come! » Federal judge strikes Nebraska's discriminatory marriage ban » CA Republicans of 2015 do thing that will make CA Republicans of 2025 say, 'Yeah. Okay. so?'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/28/2011

Sorry, @mbwithcrc, but considering your job is to royally screw our own marriages...

by Jeremy Hooper

We appreciate and even agree with the sentiment in this retweet:

Screen Shot 2011-04-28 At 2.18.29 Pm

But considering it comes from the press representative for the National Organization For Marriage...

201104281420

...you'll have to forgive us if we're not too sympathetic about her seeing "too much coverage" when it comes to certain kinds of marriages. Because daily we watch as Ms. Hutchins press releases her/NOM's desires to see our own unions forcibly annulled. And this will presumably still be the case, even when the camera crews have long left Trafalagar Square. That's waaaaaaaaaay more pervasive than Natalie Morales journalistically delving into whether or not Kate Middleton will wear flowing tendrils of an up-do.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails