RECENT  POSTS:  » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama » In 2008, the AFA was the same on LGBT rights as President Obama; and I was a flying unicorn » The Hitching Post plot thickens in a truly remarkable way » On Rivka, Robert and their dirty, self-victimizing, anti-intellectual blame game  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/28/2011

Sorry, @mbwithcrc, but considering your job is to royally screw our own marriages...

by Jeremy Hooper

We appreciate and even agree with the sentiment in this retweet:

Screen Shot 2011-04-28 At 2.18.29 Pm

But considering it comes from the press representative for the National Organization For Marriage...

201104281420

...you'll have to forgive us if we're not too sympathetic about her seeing "too much coverage" when it comes to certain kinds of marriages. Because daily we watch as Ms. Hutchins press releases her/NOM's desires to see our own unions forcibly annulled. And this will presumably still be the case, even when the camera crews have long left Trafalagar Square. That's waaaaaaaaaay more pervasive than Natalie Morales journalistically delving into whether or not Kate Middleton will wear flowing tendrils of an up-do.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails