RECENT  POSTS:  » Read: NOM's guide to pressuring lawmakers to ban marriages (while pretending you're doing something good and positive instead) » Full trailer: 'The Normal Heart' » Vintage Clinton era oppo memo perhaps even more relevant today » Concerned Women For America advises churches to lockdown exclusionary marriage views » Video: What does conservative columnist Cal Thomas see as America's biggest threat? Take a guess. » Correcting NOM's fallacious fear graphic » Gee, Bryan, can't understand why federal courts are rejecting you gay = incest view » Former NOM sr. associate admits shift: Moving away from intellectual arguments, focusing on spiritual » Prop 8 defense attorney now planning lesbian daughter's wedding » If you can't afford your event, NOM, perhaps you should just cancel  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/28/2011

Sorry, @mbwithcrc, but considering your job is to royally screw our own marriages...

by Jeremy Hooper

We appreciate and even agree with the sentiment in this retweet:

Screen Shot 2011-04-28 At 2.18.29 Pm

But considering it comes from the press representative for the National Organization For Marriage...

201104281420

...you'll have to forgive us if we're not too sympathetic about her seeing "too much coverage" when it comes to certain kinds of marriages. Because daily we watch as Ms. Hutchins press releases her/NOM's desires to see our own unions forcibly annulled. And this will presumably still be the case, even when the camera crews have long left Trafalagar Square. That's waaaaaaaaaay more pervasive than Natalie Morales journalistically delving into whether or not Kate Middleton will wear flowing tendrils of an up-do.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails