RECENT  POSTS:  » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/28/2011

Sorry, @mbwithcrc, but considering your job is to royally screw our own marriages...

by Jeremy Hooper

We appreciate and even agree with the sentiment in this retweet:

Screen Shot 2011-04-28 At 2.18.29 Pm

But considering it comes from the press representative for the National Organization For Marriage...

201104281420

...you'll have to forgive us if we're not too sympathetic about her seeing "too much coverage" when it comes to certain kinds of marriages. Because daily we watch as Ms. Hutchins press releases her/NOM's desires to see our own unions forcibly annulled. And this will presumably still be the case, even when the camera crews have long left Trafalagar Square. That's waaaaaaaaaay more pervasive than Natalie Morales journalistically delving into whether or not Kate Middleton will wear flowing tendrils of an up-do.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails