RECENT  POSTS:  » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/10/2011

Audio: NOM always opposes civil unions. Here are the excuses for doing so in Rhode Island

by Jeremy Hooper

Shocker, NOM Rhode Island's Chris Plante opposes civil unions too:

Well of course he opposes even the most basic of civil steps forward. After all, Chris can't just sit around and let "tragic situations" go on unchecked:

"When parents die and we have orphans...
we see those as tragic situations.
Same-sex marriage enshrines a tragic situation into law,
where a child is intentionally denied either his mother or his father.
"

Or, you know -- let gays adopt and turn children into "accessories" like "teacup dogs":

Though we actually agree with Chris, in one way: Compromise should not be on the table. For we are not negotiating with this constant attempt to undermine our lives, loves, and fair representation in the country to whom we pay our (unequal) taxes.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails