Audio: NOM always opposes civil unions. Here are the excuses for doing so in Rhode Island

RECENT	POSTS:	» Why I care so much about the Boy Scouts vote » New Jersey's leading 'family' group posts truly nasty video equating gays with adulterers, alcoholics » A #BoyScouts dialogue with Manhattan Declaration's Exec. Director » Um, actually there is a right side of history; obviously » Discriminación! » New ad: One of America's most hostile anti-gay groups asks BSA Delegates to make horrible mistake » Boy Scouts president cuts through the noise: 'Let in gay boys' » Video: GOP Congressman from Oklahoma attacks 'intolerance' of supporting gay boys in khaki » Equal #BoyScout opponents don't want to hear how anti-gay their allies are » Maggie doesn't want us treated cruelly, just as less 'normative' than heterosexuals

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/10/2011

by Jeremy Hooper

Shocker, NOM Rhode Island's Chris Plante opposes civil unions too:

Well of course he opposes even the most basic of civil steps forward. After all, Chris can't just sit around and let "tragic situations" go on unchecked:

"When parents die and we have orphans...
we see those as tragic situations.
Same-sex marriage enshrines a tragic situation into law,
where a child is intentionally denied either his mother or his father."

Or, you know -- let gays adopt and turn children into "accessories" like "teacup dogs":

Though we actually agree with Chris, in one way: Compromise should not be on the table. For we are not negotiating with this constant attempt to undermine our lives, loves, and fair representation in the country to whom we pay our (unequal) taxes.

space