RECENT  POSTS:  » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win.  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/09/2011

Dear comment-deleters at the New Yorker's Family Research Foundation:

by Jeremy Hooper

We all know you scrub fair-minded comments for no reason other than their failure to subscribe to your preconceived monologues. You proved that to us on Friday.

But here's the thing: If you're going to make a lifestyle choice to delete comments, you might also want to delete your own responses to them. Because if not, you're left looking prone to flights of self-dialogue:

EX. 1:

Screen Shot 2011-05-09 At 2.27.00 Pm-2

EX. 2:

Screen Shot 2011-05-09 At 2.32.18 Pm
[NYFRF Facebook]

Or you could, I don't know -- start listening to actual gay people when they tell you about their lives and loves and why civil marriage equality matters to the same?!

Sorry, hope my radically militant suggestion didn't shock you all too much.

***

*MORE: Some of us got through and left comments on their Wall. All three have since been deleted:

Screen Shot 2011-05-09 At 3.17.02 Pm-1

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails